Property:Describe available test data
From CSDMS
This is a property of type Text.
C
G
+ data structure used in gospl input file,
+ how to generate initial conditions like topography, precipitation and tectonic maps to force a simulation,
+ how to extract some of the output from the model results to visualise them in Jupyter notebooks,
+ how to run sequence of backward/forward gospl models using Python functions,
+ how to set a script for running gospl on HPC. +
U
S
O
D
-- +
L
U
-- +
A
M
D
H
L
I
H
S
O
K
A couple high resolution Pb210 curves that span ~100 years are currently being constructed and used to test model. +
P
W
A total of 17 flow problems and 15 water quality transport problems are presented in WASH123D. These example problems can serve as templates for users to apply WASH123D to research problems or practical field-scale problems. For the 13 water quality transport problems: six examples for one-dimensional transport, four examples for two-dimensional transport, and three examples for three-dimensional transport. These examples are used to achieve the following objectives:
# verify the correctness of computer implementation,
# demonstrate the need of various numerical options and coupling strategies between transport and biogeochemical processes for application-depending circumstances,
# illustrate how the generality of the water quality modeling paradigm embodies the widely used water quality models as specific examples; and
# validate the capability of the models to simulate laboratory experiments, and indicate its potential applications to field problems. +
F
A
AquaTellUs was originally developed for simulation of the fluvial-dominated Volga delta. The 2D experiments are still available and can be used as a test data set. +
I
As an example of running IDA, and a test to ensure that it is running
correctly, a small project is provided. Unpack it using
tar -xjf example.tar.bz2
Files:
dir.bin: flow directions for a 1000 x 1000 cell landscape
true.bin: the correct answer, for comparison
run.sh: a Bash script to run the example. The script must be modified to
specify the path to the IDA executable.
Running:
Make the Bash script executable with the command chmod +x run.sh
Run the Bash script with ./run.sh
It will run IDA several times with different options, and may take some time
Depending on your configuration of PETSc, some of the runs may fail +
T
Available test data sets:
* Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
* Small basin in Kentucky.
* Inclined plane for testing.
* Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
* See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
* Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
* Small basin in Kentucky.
* Inclined plane for testing.
* Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
* See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
* Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
* Small basin in Kentucky.
* Inclined plane for testing.
* Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
* See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
*Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
*Small basin in Kentucky.
*Inclined plane for testing.
*Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
*See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
*Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
*Small basin in Kentucky.
*Inclined plane for testing.
*Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
*See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
*Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
*Small basin in Kentucky.
*Inclined plane for testing.
*Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
*See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
*Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
*Small basin in Kentucky.
*Inclined plane for testing.
*Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
*See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
*Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
*Small basin in Kentucky.
*Inclined plane for testing.
*Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
*See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
*Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
*Small basin in Kentucky.
*Inclined plane for testing.
*Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
*See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
*Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
*Small basin in Kentucky.
*Inclined plane for testing.
*Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
*See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
*Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
*Small basin in Kentucky.
*Inclined plane for testing.
*Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
*See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
*Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
*Small basin in Kentucky.
*Inclined plane for testing.
*Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
*See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
*Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
*Small basin in Kentucky.
*Inclined plane for testing.
*Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
*See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test data sets:
*Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA.
* (Two large rainfall events.)
*Small basin in Kentucky.
*Inclined plane for testing.
*Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
*See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
Available test datat sets:
*Treynor watershed, in the Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa, USA. (Two large rainfall events.)
*Small basin in Kentucky.
*Inclined plane for testing.
*Arctic watershed data from Larry Hinzman (UAF).
*See /data/progs/topoflow/3.0/data on CSDMS cluster. +
C
D
Caspian sea experiences extremely rapid sea level fluctuation, making it a great test data set for coastline shifts. +
G
H
Db_dem.zip +
T
S
Example outputs and associated wrapper scripts are available through the University of Virginia Dataverse at https://dx.doi.org/10.18130/V3/E0EGOC +
M
W
Extensive input dataset is available on the CSDMS HPCC (beach) at '/scratch/ccny/RGISarchive' and '/scratch/saco2635/RGISarchiveCSDMS'. +
R
Flow velocities measured under current conditions in the Everglades in ridge (high-flow-resistance) and slough (low-flow-resistance) vegetation communities. This is very limited validation, as it only tests simulated velocities at the low end of the range of velocities the model is capable of simulating. Results are shown in Larsen and Harvey, Geomorphology, 2010, Fig. 4. +
S
G
Global (GEMS-GLORI), regional, national and literature compilations. A subset used for validation. +
1
Hillslope morphology data from the Dragon's Back Pressure Ridge is included in packaged code. +
W
I have numerous data sets produced by an 8 processor Mac and a local unix cluster to confirm the model is initialized correctly. +
B
In order to verify the millennial-scale evolution of a barrier island, it is necessary to know the sea level curve, the rate of lagoonal deposition, the rate of overwash and the initial shelf profile. The BIT Model has been applied to the shelf profile in front of Sand Key, Florida. +
H
Input data used in the preparation of the associated manuscript is all available from www.opentopography.org along with all processing and visualization code at https://github.com/sgrieve/LH_Paper_Plotting so users can compare their results with those contained within the manuscript. +
1
MS thesis +
W
Model test data are available through https://github.com/ajwdewit/pcse and described in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105746 +
S
Model was only used for modeling coastline change in the vicinity of Barrow, Alaska. Hourly wind data from a met station at the Barrow Airport was used to drive the model. High-resolution coastline data digitized from aerial photos by Manley et al. (2006) was used for initial and final coastlines. The latter was used for validation purposes. High-resolution DEMs were also used. +
R
Modeling testing performed on data from the lower Colorado River and North Fork Toutle River. Model input data available here: https://github.com/rodlammers/REM +
H
F
N/A +
I
M
None at present - forthcoming +
G
W
ONR test bed and others. +
P
L
Permafrost model can be tested with ground temperature time series at several depths. Lake model can be tested with known ice depths (though snow, not accounted for in model, can affect depth by several 10s of cm). +
G
Please look at the GEOtop website: http://www.slideshare.net/GEOFRAMEcafe/geotop-2008?type=powerpoint +
C
Q(m^3/s): daily water discharge series, 365 by 1 matrix
Qs(kg/s): daily sediment flux series, 365 by 1 matrix
The trigger flood event is set at the 232th day +
G
Sample input and output files are included with the code. +
Sample input files used to create plots shown in manual. +
S
C
See answer above; many shoreline data sets exist. Comparing model results to detailed records of coastline change will become more appropriate as the model is used to investigate shoreline change in more detail in a particular location and time period.
However, to date the model has been used chiefly for relatively abstract explorations of how coastline evolution works: how emergent coastline structures such as capes, spits, and alongshore sand waves form and interact; how heterogeneity in underlying geology affects coastline evolution; how scenarios of changing storm and wave climates would affect coastline change; and how human manipulations alter large-scale coastline change). Ashton and Murray (2006b) compared robust model predictions concerning the way local wave climates vary along a coastline with emergent structures (capes and flying spits) to hindcast wave climates along actual shorelines. As opposed to testing whether model parameters can be adjusted to reproduce observations in detail, testing a robust prediction like this, which does not depend on the formal details of the model ingredients, can falsify the hypothesis that the interactions in the model capture the basic aspects of the interactions that are important in the actual system (see Murray, 2003; 2007). +
L
See applications described in software documentation http://water.usgs.gov/software/loadest/doc/ +
E
See article: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10121915 +
R
See uploaded data file (Data.tar); or visit: http://fiesta.bren.ucsb.edu/~rhessys/setup/downloads/source.shtml +
O
C
H
L
C
Several papers have been published that can be used in comparison tests (simply Google Niedoroda) +
T
St. Anthony Falls Laboratory downstream fining experiments (Rebecca Soileau, Chris Paola and Gary Parker) +
M
Test data sets are provided as part of releases available at https://www.usgs.gov/software/modflow-6-usgs-modular-hydrologic-model to verify that MODFLOW 6 is correctly installed and running on the system.
Test data sets are also available from https://github.com/MODFLOW-USGS/modflow6-examples (and viewable online at https://modflow6.readthedocs.io/), https://github.com/MODFLOW-USGS/modflow6-testmodels, and https://github.com/MODFLOW-USGS/modflow6-largetestmodels
The tests may also be looked at as examples of how to use the program. +
Test data sets are provided to verify that MODFLOW-2000 is correctly installed and running on the system. The tests may also be looked at as examples of how to use the program. +
D
Test data was slightly updated from a published dataset by Passalacqua, P., Lanzoni, S., Paola, C., and Rinaldo, A.: Geomorphic signatures of deltaic processes and vegetation: The Ganges-
Brahmaputra-Jamuna case study, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 118, 1838–1849, 2013. +
Test datasets available on the web:
http://www.hydro.washington.edu/Lettenmaier/Models/DHSVM/documentation.shtml +
The LBRM model has been applied to 121 large watersheds surrounding the Laurentian Great Lakes since its development in the 1980s. +
T
The model has been tested against field data on tracer dispersal collected on Halfmoon Creek, Colorado USA, by Bradley and Tucker (2012) and Bradley (2017), and on the Buech River, France, by Brousse et al. (2019), Michal Tal and Daniel Vazquez-Tarrio. The Halfmoon Creek data are available as supporting information of Bradley (2017). The Buech River data are in teh model github repository.
REFERENCES
Bradley, D. N. (2017). Direct observation of heavy-tailed storage times of bed load tracer particles causing anomalous superdiffusion. Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 12227-12235.
Bradley, D. N & Tucker, G. E. (2012). Measuring gravel transport and dispersion in a mountain river using passive radio tracers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37, 1034-1045.
Brousse, G., Arnaud-Fassetta, G., Liebault, F., Bertrand, M., Melum, G., Loire, R., Malavoi, J.-R., Fantino, G. & Borgniet, L. (2020). Channel response to sediment replenishment in a large gravel-bed river: The case of the Saint-Sauveur dam in the Buech River (Southern Alps, France). River Research and Application, 36 (6), 880-893. +
S
The model is issued with three example simulations: 1) A centerline migration example starting from a nearly straight stream; 2) A floodplain deposition simulation and 3) A simulation modeling 5 years of migration of the Madidi river. This simulation uses downstream sediment routing, and the model is tested against the actual river migration during the same time interval. See the program documentation for details. +
H
The test datasets were used in the paper https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7795-2021
The test datasets were published as https://zenodo.org/records/4541239 +
C
There are 3 datasets within this repository. One from Southwest Pennsylvania, one from the Apennines in Italy, and one from a CHILD model run. Datasets are the same as those run with the associated manuscript (http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/smudd/Muddetal_JGRsubmit.pdf) so users can compare results with figures from the manuscript. +
T
There are some cases for testing on website:
http://www.opentelemac.org/index.php?option=com_jdownloads&Itemid=31&view=viewcategory&catid=4&lang=en +
S
Two test DEMs are included in the repository, alongside their respective driver files. These are used in the original manuscript. +
D
Two test DEMs are included in the repository, both from Wayne National Forest, Ohio. Two example driver files, one for each DEM, are also included. These DEMs are the same as are used in the associated manuscript (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013WR015167/full) so that the resulting channel networks can be compared with figures from the paper. +
M
Two years worth of input data is available to download with the model source code as a means to get familiar with the model. Other datasets are available upon request. Work is ongoing to provide generation utilities for input datasets from raw data sources. +
P
L
Varies among components and models. All components include internal consistency checks using the doctest package. +
H
Water & sediment discharge of Eel river; Waipaoa river, Po River, Rhone River, Lanyang river, etc. +
R
We have a website for test problems: http://marine.rutgers.edu/po/index.php?model=test-problems +
C
We have a website for test problems: http://marine.rutgers.edu/po/index.php?model=test-problems +
We have a website for test problems: http://marine.rutgers.edu/po/index.php?model=test-problems +
U
We have a website for test problems: http://marine.rutgers.edu/po/index.php?model=test-problems +
E
We performed a model sensitivity analysis and the results are reported in the Equilibrium_results_submit.xlsx file uploaded in the github repository +
N
We provide a small clip of the Dragon's Back Pressure Ridge 0.25m gridded LiDAR for user testing. +
B
examples description provided with the documentation
http://github.com/badlands-model/Badlands-doc/releases +
C
http://elena.tolkova.com/Cliffs_data/slpbeach.zip
http://elena.tolkova.com/Cliffs_data/OkushiriTsunami.zip
for description of the test data sets, see http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.0753 +
G
N
G
F
matlab data for ensemble-averaged profiles of sediment concentration (conc), fluid velocity (vel) and turbulent kinetic energy (k) at the flow peak of Case 2; +
M
L
C
D
X
O
D
various public and limited access data sets used for during software development; regression testcases used for release updates; first version of formal validation document available for flow module +
R
water temperature measurements over summer seasons of 2014-2016 +
