Property:Describe available test data
From CSDMS
This is a property of type Text.
S
C
See answer above; many shoreline data sets exist. Comparing model results to detailed records of coastline change will become more appropriate as the model is used to investigate shoreline change in more detail in a particular location and time period.
However, to date the model has been used chiefly for relatively abstract explorations of how coastline evolution works: how emergent coastline structures such as capes, spits, and alongshore sand waves form and interact; how heterogeneity in underlying geology affects coastline evolution; how scenarios of changing storm and wave climates would affect coastline change; and how human manipulations alter large-scale coastline change). Ashton and Murray (2006b) compared robust model predictions concerning the way local wave climates vary along a coastline with emergent structures (capes and flying spits) to hindcast wave climates along actual shorelines. As opposed to testing whether model parameters can be adjusted to reproduce observations in detail, testing a robust prediction like this, which does not depend on the formal details of the model ingredients, can falsify the hypothesis that the interactions in the model capture the basic aspects of the interactions that are important in the actual system (see Murray, 2003; 2007). +
L
See applications described in software documentation http://water.usgs.gov/software/loadest/doc/ +
E
See article: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10121915 +
R
See uploaded data file (Data.tar); or visit: http://fiesta.bren.ucsb.edu/~rhessys/setup/downloads/source.shtml +
O
C
H
L
C
Several papers have been published that can be used in comparison tests (simply Google Niedoroda) +
T
St. Anthony Falls Laboratory downstream fining experiments (Rebecca Soileau, Chris Paola and Gary Parker) +
M
Test data sets are provided as part of releases available at https://www.usgs.gov/software/modflow-6-usgs-modular-hydrologic-model to verify that MODFLOW 6 is correctly installed and running on the system.
Test data sets are also available from https://github.com/MODFLOW-USGS/modflow6-examples (and viewable online at https://modflow6.readthedocs.io/), https://github.com/MODFLOW-USGS/modflow6-testmodels, and https://github.com/MODFLOW-USGS/modflow6-largetestmodels
The tests may also be looked at as examples of how to use the program. +
Test data sets are provided to verify that MODFLOW-2000 is correctly installed and running on the system. The tests may also be looked at as examples of how to use the program. +
D
Test data was slightly updated from a published dataset by Passalacqua, P., Lanzoni, S., Paola, C., and Rinaldo, A.: Geomorphic signatures of deltaic processes and vegetation: The Ganges-
Brahmaputra-Jamuna case study, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 118, 1838–1849, 2013. +
Test datasets available on the web:
http://www.hydro.washington.edu/Lettenmaier/Models/DHSVM/documentation.shtml +
The LBRM model has been applied to 121 large watersheds surrounding the Laurentian Great Lakes since its development in the 1980s. +
T
The model has been tested against field data on tracer dispersal collected on Halfmoon Creek, Colorado USA, by Bradley and Tucker (2012) and Bradley (2017), and on the Buech River, France, by Brousse et al. (2019), Michal Tal and Daniel Vazquez-Tarrio. The Halfmoon Creek data are available as supporting information of Bradley (2017). The Buech River data are in teh model github repository.
REFERENCES
Bradley, D. N. (2017). Direct observation of heavy-tailed storage times of bed load tracer particles causing anomalous superdiffusion. Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 12227-12235.
Bradley, D. N & Tucker, G. E. (2012). Measuring gravel transport and dispersion in a mountain river using passive radio tracers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37, 1034-1045.
Brousse, G., Arnaud-Fassetta, G., Liebault, F., Bertrand, M., Melum, G., Loire, R., Malavoi, J.-R., Fantino, G. & Borgniet, L. (2020). Channel response to sediment replenishment in a large gravel-bed river: The case of the Saint-Sauveur dam in the Buech River (Southern Alps, France). River Research and Application, 36 (6), 880-893. +
S
The model is issued with three example simulations: 1) A centerline migration example starting from a nearly straight stream; 2) A floodplain deposition simulation and 3) A simulation modeling 5 years of migration of the Madidi river. This simulation uses downstream sediment routing, and the model is tested against the actual river migration during the same time interval. See the program documentation for details. +
H
The test datasets were used in the paper https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7795-2021
The test datasets were published as https://zenodo.org/records/4541239 +
C
There are 3 datasets within this repository. One from Southwest Pennsylvania, one from the Apennines in Italy, and one from a CHILD model run. Datasets are the same as those run with the associated manuscript (http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/smudd/Muddetal_JGRsubmit.pdf) so users can compare results with figures from the manuscript. +
T
There are some cases for testing on website:
http://www.opentelemac.org/index.php?option=com_jdownloads&Itemid=31&view=viewcategory&catid=4&lang=en +
S
Two test DEMs are included in the repository, alongside their respective driver files. These are used in the original manuscript. +
D
Two test DEMs are included in the repository, both from Wayne National Forest, Ohio. Two example driver files, one for each DEM, are also included. These DEMs are the same as are used in the associated manuscript (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013WR015167/full) so that the resulting channel networks can be compared with figures from the paper. +
M
Two years worth of input data is available to download with the model source code as a means to get familiar with the model. Other datasets are available upon request. Work is ongoing to provide generation utilities for input datasets from raw data sources. +
P
L
Varies among components and models. All components include internal consistency checks using the doctest package. +
H
Water & sediment discharge of Eel river; Waipaoa river, Po River, Rhone River, Lanyang river, etc. +
R
We have a website for test problems: http://marine.rutgers.edu/po/index.php?model=test-problems +
C
We have a website for test problems: http://marine.rutgers.edu/po/index.php?model=test-problems +
We have a website for test problems: http://marine.rutgers.edu/po/index.php?model=test-problems +
U
We have a website for test problems: http://marine.rutgers.edu/po/index.php?model=test-problems +
E
We performed a model sensitivity analysis and the results are reported in the Equilibrium_results_submit.xlsx file uploaded in the github repository +
N
We provide a small clip of the Dragon's Back Pressure Ridge 0.25m gridded LiDAR for user testing. +
B
examples description provided with the documentation
http://github.com/badlands-model/Badlands-doc/releases +
C
http://elena.tolkova.com/Cliffs_data/slpbeach.zip
http://elena.tolkova.com/Cliffs_data/OkushiriTsunami.zip
for description of the test data sets, see http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.0753 +
G
N
G
F
matlab data for ensemble-averaged profiles of sediment concentration (conc), fluid velocity (vel) and turbulent kinetic energy (k) at the flow peak of Case 2; +
M
L
C
D
X
O
D
various public and limited access data sets used for during software development; regression testcases used for release updates; first version of formal validation document available for flow module +
R
water temperature measurements over summer seasons of 2014-2016 +
