Meeting:Abstract 2011 CSDMS meeting-068: Difference between revisions

From CSDMS
m (Created page with "{{#ifeq:{{#expr:{{#time: U}}>{{#expr: {{#expr:{{#switch: {{#sub:{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}|4|-8}} | 7 = 1309478400 | 8 = 1312156800 | 9 = 1314835200 | 10 = 1317427200 }} + {{#expr:{{#...")
 
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#ifeq:{{#expr:{{#time: U}}>{{#expr:
<!--{{CSDMS meeting program template
{{#expr:{{#switch: {{#sub:{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}|4|-8}}
|CSDMS meeting first hydrological choice=I am not interested
| 7 = 1309478400
|CSDMS meeting second hydrological choice=I am not interested
| 8 = 1312156800
|CSDMS meeting first terrestrial choice=I am not interested
| 9 = 1314835200
|CSDMS meeting second terrestrial choice=I am not interested
| 10 = 1317427200
|CSDMS meeting first coastal choice=I am not interested
}} + {{#expr:{{#sub:{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}|6|-6}}*24*3600}} + {{#expr:{{#sub:{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}|8|-4}}*3600}} +  {{#expr:{{#sub:{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}|10|-2}} *60}} + {{#sub:{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}|12}} -64800}}+30 }} }}|1|{{CSDMS meeting 2011 paid}}|{{CSDMS meeting 2011 not paid}} }}<br>
|CSDMS meeting second coastal choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting first marine choice=ROMS
|CSDMS meeting second marine choice=Sedflux
|CSDMS meeting first carbonate choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting second carbonate choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting first tool choice=GRASS
|CSDMS meeting second tool choice=I am not interested
}}-->
{{CSDMS meeting personal information template
{{CSDMS meeting personal information template
|CSDMS meeting first name=Ben
|CSDMS meeting first name=Ben
Line 12: Line 19:
|CSDMS meeting city=Boulder
|CSDMS meeting city=Boulder
|CSDMS meeting state=Colorado
|CSDMS meeting state=Colorado
|CSDMS meeting country=USA
|CSDMS meeting country=United States
|CSDMS meeting email address=Benjamin.Hudson@colorado.edu
|CSDMS meeting email address=Benjamin.Hudson@colorado.edu
}}
}}
Line 19: Line 26:
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title template
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title template
|CSDMS meeting abstract title=TBA
|CSDMS meeting abstract title=Combining MODIS imagery and PLUME modeling to estimate discharge of freshwater from the Greenland Ice Sheet to the coast
}}
{{CSDMS meeting authors template
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Irina
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Overeem
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=CSDMS - INSTAAR, Univ. of Colorado
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Boulder
|State=Colorado
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=United States
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=irina.overeem@colorado.edu
}}
{{CSDMS meeting authors template
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Daniel
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=McGrath
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Cires, Univ. of Colorado
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Boulder
|State=Colorado
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=United States
}}
{{CSDMS meeting authors template
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=James
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Syvitski
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=CSDMS - INSTAAR, Univ. of Colorado
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Boulder
|State=Colorado
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=United States
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=james.syvitski@colorado.edu
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template
|CSDMS meeting abstract=Very few in-situ measurements of runoff from the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) exist, though melt water runoff from the GrIS is important to global eustatic sea level, ocean salinity, thermohaline circulation and sea ice dynamics and the transport of sediment and nutrients to fjords and the ocean. We continue to develop the use of NASA MODIS imagery to gauge river discharge of sediment and freshwater into fjords hydrologically linked to the GrIS.
 
Essential to this remote sensing proxy are accurate models of fjord and plume dynamics. We compare Hutton and Syvitski’s PLUME model results to in situ oceanographic and sedimentological measurements of Greenlandic river sediment/freshwater plumes towards the end goal of exploring the suitability of inverting the PLUME model and combining it with remotely sensed MODIS imagery to estimate river discharge.
 
Within our study fjords a range of estuarine conditions present a robust test for our plume method, and in turn conditions present a range of complexities to test the suitability of inverting the PLUME model. Fjord conditions range from ocean to river dominated. Some plumes mix very quickly from fresh to near full ocean salinities (22 – 28 PSU). Other plumes maintain low salinities (0 – 10 PSU) to depths exceeding six meters and down fjord over 65 km. Fjord geometries, tidal range, and other conditions impact sediment plume dynamics. These dynamics must be accounted for to link plume imagery to discharge into fjords.
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template}}
{{blank line template}}
{{blank line template}}
{{CSDMS meeting program template
{{CSDMS meeting program template1
|CSDMS meeting first hydrological choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting first day choice=Sedflux
|CSDMS meeting second hydrological choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting second day choice=Delft3D
|CSDMS meeting first terrestrial choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting third day choice=ROMS - CSTMS
|CSDMS meeting second terrestrial choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting first coastal choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting second coastal choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting first marine choice=ROMS
|CSDMS meeting second marine choice=Sedflux
|CSDMS meeting first carbonate choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting second carbonate choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting first tool choice=GRASS
|CSDMS meeting second tool choice=I am not interested
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting logistics template
{{CSDMS meeting logistics template

Latest revision as of 15:11, 10 June 2017


Browse  abstracts

CSDMS all hands meeting 2011

Combining MODIS imagery and PLUME modeling to estimate discharge of freshwater from the Greenland Ice Sheet to the coast

Ben Hudson, CSDMS Boulder Colorado, . Benjamin.Hudson@colorado.edu
Irina Overeem, CSDMS - INSTAAR, Univ. of Colorado Boulder Colorado, United States. irina.overeem@colorado.edu
Daniel McGrath, Cires, Univ. of Colorado Boulder Colorado, United States.
James Syvitski, CSDMS - INSTAAR, Univ. of Colorado Boulder Colorado, United States. james.syvitski@colorado.edu


[[Image:|300px|right|link=File:]]Very few in-situ measurements of runoff from the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) exist, though melt water runoff from the GrIS is important to global eustatic sea level, ocean salinity, thermohaline circulation and sea ice dynamics and the transport of sediment and nutrients to fjords and the ocean. We continue to develop the use of NASA MODIS imagery to gauge river discharge of sediment and freshwater into fjords hydrologically linked to the GrIS.

Essential to this remote sensing proxy are accurate models of fjord and plume dynamics. We compare Hutton and Syvitski’s PLUME model results to in situ oceanographic and sedimentological measurements of Greenlandic river sediment/freshwater plumes towards the end goal of exploring the suitability of inverting the PLUME model and combining it with remotely sensed MODIS imagery to estimate river discharge.

Within our study fjords a range of estuarine conditions present a robust test for our plume method, and in turn conditions present a range of complexities to test the suitability of inverting the PLUME model. Fjord conditions range from ocean to river dominated. Some plumes mix very quickly from fresh to near full ocean salinities (22 – 28 PSU). Other plumes maintain low salinities (0 – 10 PSU) to depths exceeding six meters and down fjord over 65 km. Fjord geometries, tidal range, and other conditions impact sediment plume dynamics. These dynamics must be accounted for to link plume imagery to discharge into fjords.