Annualmeeting:2017 CSDMS meeting-120

From CSDMS
Revision as of 09:50, 30 March 2017 by WikiSysop (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)






Browse  abstracts



Very Fine Scale of Permafrost Distribution and Controlling Factors

Bin Cao, Lanzhou University Lanzhou , China. caobin198912@outlook.com
Tingjun Zhang, Lanzhou University Lanzhou , China. tjzhang@lzu.edu.cn


[[Image:|300px|right|link=File:]]Besides long-term monitoring in changes of thermal state of permafrost and active layer thickness, the knowledge of permafrost distribution at very fine scales (tens of meters) in discontinuous permafrost is still largely unknown in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP). A permafrost island was found by using geophysical investigations in the Heihe River Basin in northeastern QTP. Permafrost island was present at PT10 site beneath alpine steppe and coarse soil with a quality of gravel in surface soil (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). In contrast, permafrost is absent at SFGT site with density land cover area and relatively less gravel. The results showed that the ground surface temperature (5 cm) at PT10 site is lower in winter and higher in summer than the SFG site. The presence of permafrost is caused by soil conditions, especially by high thermal conductivity, based on field investigations. To address the controlling factors of permafrost presentences a 1D heat transfer model is used to compare the ground temperature difference between these two sites by only changing the soil conditions.


ERT-based Permafrost Island.png
Fig. 1 ERT measurements conducted in 31/07/2015 with
an electrode probe interval of 5 m. Permafrost
island are roughly determined by the
resistivity contour of 1010 Ω, which
is the resistivity value at the interface
of frozen/unfrozen. Borehole locations are
marked by black square.


Land Cover.png
Fig. 2 Photograph of land cover taken in 31/07/2015.