Reference:Reference-002671: Difference between revisions
From CSDMS
m (Text replacement - "|MS_PublicationClusterID=2268412354" to "|MS_PublicationClusterID=2268412354 |Semantic_ID=81c023e109718cc1ac31fb371c906238d4797b22
") |
m (Text replacement - " |Semantic_ID" to " |Semantic_ID") |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|FeatureRef=No | |FeatureRef=No | ||
|PublicationClusterID=0 | |PublicationClusterID=0 | ||
|MS_PublicationClusterID=2268412354 |Semantic_ID=81c023e109718cc1ac31fb371c906238d4797b22 | |MS_PublicationClusterID=2268412354 | ||
|Semantic_ID=81c023e109718cc1ac31fb371c906238d4797b22 | |||
|PublicationWhatKindOf=a module application description | |PublicationWhatKindOf=a module application description | ||
|PublicationNrofModels=a single module | |PublicationNrofModels=a single module |
Revision as of 14:49, 9 January 2022
Author(s) | Camargo, G.G.T.; Kemanian, A.R.; |
BibType | journalArticle |
Title | Six crop models differ in their simulation of water uptake |
Editors | |
Year | 2016-04-01 |
Journal | Agricultural and Forest Meteorology |
Booktitle | |
Volume | 220 |
Pages | 116–129 |
URL | https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168192316300156 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.01.013 |
ISBN | |
Note | Auto downloaded ref at: 2020-06-17
|
|
|
Feature reference | No |
PublicationClusterID | 0 |
MS_PublicationClusterID | 2268412354 |
Semantic_ID | 81c023e109718cc1ac31fb371c906238d4797b22 |
CorpusID | {{{CorpusID}}} |
Nr of citations | 46 |
Sort of publication | a module application description |
Sort of model publication | a single module |
Is the CSDMS HPC used | No |
If HPC is used, for what project was it?: | |
Associated simulation movie if any: |
|
Model(s) discussed: | ApsimX |