Meeting:Abstract 2013 CSDMS meeting-011: Difference between revisions

From CSDMS
Created page with "{{CSDMS meeting 2013 not paid}} {{CSDMS meeting personal information template-2013 |CSDMS meeting first name=Carl |CSDMS meeting last name=Friedrichs |CSDMS meeting institute=..."
 
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{CSDMS meeting 2013 not paid}}
 
{{CSDMS meeting personal information template-2013
{{CSDMS meeting personal information template-2013
|CSDMS meeting first name=Carl
|CSDMS meeting first name=Carl
Line 14: Line 14:
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title template-2013
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title template-2013
|CSDMS meeting abstract title=Intercomparison of 3-D Hydrodynamic Models of the Chesapeake Bay
|CSDMS meeting abstract title=Combining Observations and Numerical Model Results to Improve Estimates of Hypoxic Volume Within the Chesapeake Bay
}}
{{CSDMS meeting authors template
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Aaron
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Bever
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Delta Modeling Associates, Inc.
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=San Francisco
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=United States
|State=California
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=aaron@deltamodeling.com
}}
{{CSDMS meeting authors template
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Marjy
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Friedrichs
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Virginia Institute of Marine Science
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Gloucester Point
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=United States
|State=Virginia
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=marjy@vims.edu
}}
{{CSDMS meeting authors template
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Malcolm
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Scully
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Woods Hole
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=United States
|State=Massachusetts
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=mscully@whoi.edu
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template
|CSDMS meeting abstract=To be added.
|CSDMS meeting abstract=The overall size of the Chesapeake Bay “dead zone” is quantified by the Bay’s hypoxic volume (HV), i.e., the volume of water with dissolved oxygen (DO) less than 2 mg/L. In order to improve estimates of HV, DO was subsampled from the output of three dimensional model hindcasts at times/locations matching the set of 2004-2005 stations monitored by the Chesapeake Bay Program. The resulting station profiles were then input into an interpolation program to produce Bay-wide estimates of HV in a manner consistent with non-synoptic, cruise-based estimates. Interpolations of the same stations sampled synoptically as well as multiple other combinations of station profiles were examined in order to quantify uncertainties associated with interpolating HV from observed profiles. The potential uncertainty in summer HV estimates resulting from profiles being collected over two weeks rather than synoptically, averaged ~5 km^3. This is larger than that due to sampling at discrete stations and interpolating/extrapolating to the entire Bay (2.4 km^3 ). As a result, sampling fewer, selected stations over a shorter time period is likely to reduce uncertainties associated with interpolating HV from observed profiles. A function was also derived, that, when applied to a subset of 13 stations, significantly improved estimates of HV. Finally, multiple metrics for quantifying Bay wide hypoxia were examined, and cumulative hypoxic volume was determined to be particularly useful, as a result of its insensitivity to temporal errors and climate change. A final product of this analysis is a nearly three-decade time series of improved estimates of HV for Chesapeake Bay. (Submitted March 2013 to Journal of Geophysical Research. For a pdf pre-print contact Carl Friedrichs at cfried@vims.edu .)
}}
}}
{{blank line template}}
{{blank line template}}

Latest revision as of 15:12, 10 June 2017

Browse  abstracts

CSDMS all hands meeting 2013

Combining Observations and Numerical Model Results to Improve Estimates of Hypoxic Volume Within the Chesapeake Bay

Carl Friedrichs, Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gloucester Point Virginia, United States. cfried@vims.edu
Aaron Bever, Delta Modeling Associates, Inc. San Francisco California, United States. aaron@deltamodeling.com
Marjy Friedrichs, Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gloucester Point Virginia, United States. marjy@vims.edu
Malcolm Scully, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole Massachusetts, United States. mscully@whoi.edu


[[Image:|300px|right|link=File:]]The overall size of the Chesapeake Bay “dead zone” is quantified by the Bay’s hypoxic volume (HV), i.e., the volume of water with dissolved oxygen (DO) less than 2 mg/L. In order to improve estimates of HV, DO was subsampled from the output of three dimensional model hindcasts at times/locations matching the set of 2004-2005 stations monitored by the Chesapeake Bay Program. The resulting station profiles were then input into an interpolation program to produce Bay-wide estimates of HV in a manner consistent with non-synoptic, cruise-based estimates. Interpolations of the same stations sampled synoptically as well as multiple other combinations of station profiles were examined in order to quantify uncertainties associated with interpolating HV from observed profiles. The potential uncertainty in summer HV estimates resulting from profiles being collected over two weeks rather than synoptically, averaged ~5 km^3. This is larger than that due to sampling at discrete stations and interpolating/extrapolating to the entire Bay (2.4 km^3 ). As a result, sampling fewer, selected stations over a shorter time period is likely to reduce uncertainties associated with interpolating HV from observed profiles. A function was also derived, that, when applied to a subset of 13 stations, significantly improved estimates of HV. Finally, multiple metrics for quantifying Bay wide hypoxia were examined, and cumulative hypoxic volume was determined to be particularly useful, as a result of its insensitivity to temporal errors and climate change. A final product of this analysis is a nearly three-decade time series of improved estimates of HV for Chesapeake Bay. (Submitted March 2013 to Journal of Geophysical Research. For a pdf pre-print contact Carl Friedrichs at cfried@vims.edu .)