Meeting:Abstract 2011 CSDMS meeting-048: Difference between revisions
From CSDMS
Created page with " {{#ifeq:{{#expr:{{#time: U}}>{{#expr: {{#expr:{{#switch: {{#sub:{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP}}|4|-8}} | 7 = 1309478400 | 8 = 1312156800 | 9 = 1314835200 | 10 = 1317427200 }} + {{#expr:{{..." |
m Text replacement - "USA" to "United States" |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!--{{CSDMS meeting program template | |||
{{ | |CSDMS meeting first hydrological choice=MODFLOW | ||
|CSDMS meeting second hydrological choice=TopoFlow | |||
| | |CSDMS meeting first terrestrial choice=Delft3D | ||
| | |CSDMS meeting second terrestrial choice=CHILD | ||
| | |CSDMS meeting first coastal choice=CEM | ||
| | |CSDMS meeting second coastal choice=Delft3D | ||
|CSDMS meeting first marine choice=Sedflux | |||
|CSDMS meeting second marine choice=Delft3D | |||
|CSDMS meeting first carbonate choice=Cyclopath | |||
|CSDMS meeting second carbonate choice=I am not interested | |||
|CSDMS meeting first tool choice=GRASS | |||
|CSDMS meeting second tool choice=PIHMgis | |||
}}--> | |||
{{CSDMS meeting personal information template | {{CSDMS meeting personal information template | ||
|CSDMS meeting first name=Jorge | |CSDMS meeting first name=Jorge | ||
| Line 13: | Line 19: | ||
|CSDMS meeting city=Minneapolis | |CSDMS meeting city=Minneapolis | ||
|CSDMS meeting state=Minnesota | |CSDMS meeting state=Minnesota | ||
|CSDMS meeting country= | |CSDMS meeting country=United States | ||
|CSDMS meeting email address=loren153@umn.edu | |CSDMS meeting email address=loren153@umn.edu | ||
|CSDMS meeting phone=6122329467 | |CSDMS meeting phone=6122329467 | ||
| Line 21: | Line 27: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title template | {{CSDMS meeting abstract title template | ||
|CSDMS meeting abstract title=A model framework for fluvial-delta evolution that accounts for the accumulation of organic sediment | |CSDMS meeting abstract title=A model framework for fluvial-delta evolution that accounts for the accumulation of organic sediment | ||
}} | |||
{{CSDMS meeting authors template | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Vaughan | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Voller | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Minneapolis | |||
|State=Minnesota | |||
}} | |||
{{CSDMS meeting authors template | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Chris | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Paola | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Minneapolis | |||
|State=Minnesota | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template | {{CSDMS meeting abstract template | ||
|CSDMS meeting abstract=The evolution of fluvial deltas involves a complex web of processes, many of which are yet poorly understood. In particular, the role of organic matter (peat) accumulation on delta dynamics still remains elusive. Here, we present a simple geometric prism model that couples the evolution of the delta plain with the accumulation of organic-rich sediment. The model is able to explain the observed coupling between the accommodation/peat accumulation ratio and the quality of buried peat/coal deposits in the delta plain. Similarly to multiple modern and ancient organic-rich sedimentary environments, the model preserves the maximum volume fraction of organic sediment in the delta plain when the overall accommodation rate approximately equals the rate of peat accumulation. Further analysis of the model under simple scenarios of base-level rise and pivot subsidence shows that organic matter accumulation can either enhance or alleviate shoreline transgression. | |CSDMS meeting abstract=The evolution of fluvial deltas involves a complex web of processes, many of which are yet poorly understood. In particular, the role of organic matter (peat) accumulation on delta dynamics still remains elusive. Here, we present a simple geometric prism model that couples the evolution of the delta plain with the accumulation of organic-rich sediment. The model is able to explain the observed coupling between the accommodation/peat accumulation ratio and the quality of buried peat/coal deposits in the delta plain. Similarly to multiple modern and ancient organic-rich sedimentary environments, the model preserves the maximum volume fraction of organic sediment in the delta plain when the overall accommodation rate approximately equals the rate of peat accumulation. Further analysis of the model under simple scenarios of base-level rise and pivot subsidence shows that organic matter accumulation can either enhance or alleviate shoreline transgression. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{blank line template}} | {{blank line template}} | ||
{{CSDMS meeting program | {{CSDMS meeting program template1 | ||
|CSDMS meeting first | |CSDMS meeting first day choice=CEM | ||
|CSDMS meeting second day choice=Delft3D | |||
|CSDMS meeting third day choice=ROMS - CSTMS | |||
|CSDMS meeting second | |||
|CSDMS meeting | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{CSDMS meeting logistics template | {{CSDMS meeting logistics template | ||
Latest revision as of 15:10, 10 June 2017
Browse abstracts
CSDMS all hands meeting 2011
A model framework for fluvial-delta evolution that accounts for the accumulation of organic sediment
Jorge Lorenzo Trueba, Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory Minneapolis Minnesota, . loren153@umn.edu
Vaughan Voller, Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory Minneapolis Minnesota, .
Chris Paola, Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory Minneapolis Minnesota, .
[[Image:|300px|right|link=File:]]The evolution of fluvial deltas involves a complex web of processes, many of which are yet poorly understood. In particular, the role of organic matter (peat) accumulation on delta dynamics still remains elusive. Here, we present a simple geometric prism model that couples the evolution of the delta plain with the accumulation of organic-rich sediment. The model is able to explain the observed coupling between the accommodation/peat accumulation ratio and the quality of buried peat/coal deposits in the delta plain. Similarly to multiple modern and ancient organic-rich sedimentary environments, the model preserves the maximum volume fraction of organic sediment in the delta plain when the overall accommodation rate approximately equals the rate of peat accumulation. Further analysis of the model under simple scenarios of base-level rise and pivot subsidence shows that organic matter accumulation can either enhance or alleviate shoreline transgression.
