Model help:AgDegNormGravMixPW: Difference between revisions

From CSDMS
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "http://csdms.colorado.edu/wiki/" to "https://csdms.colorado.edu/wiki/")
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
1) Log in to the wiki
1) Log in to the wiki
2) Create a new page for each model, by using the following URL:
2) Create a new page for each model, by using the following URL:
   * http://csdms.colorado.edu/wiki/Model help:<modelname>
   * https://csdms.colorado.edu/wiki/Model help:<modelname>
   * Replace <modelname> with the name of a model
   * Replace <modelname> with the name of a model
3) Than follow the link "edit this page"
3) Than follow the link "edit this page"
Line 17: Line 17:


==Model introduction==
==Model introduction==
This program computes the time evolution of the long profile of a river of constant width carrying a mixture of gravel sizes, the downstream end of which has a prescribed elevation. In particular, the program computes the time evolution of the spatial profiles of bed elevation, total gravel bedload transport rate and grain size distribution of the surface (active) layer of the bed. The river has constant width. The upstream point, at which sediment is fed, is fixed in the horizontal to be at x = 0. The vertical elevation of the upstream point may change freely as the bed aggrades or degrades. The reach has constant length L, so that the downstream point is fixed in the horizontal at x = L. This downstream point has a user-specified initial elevation hdI.
The program AgDegNormGravMixPW is an extension of AgDegNormal for sediment mixtures in gravel bed rivers where the channel bed material is transported as bedload only.  
 
Gravel bedload transport of mixtures is computed with a user-specified selection of the Parker (1990), or Wilcock-Crowe (2003) surface-based formulations for gravel transport. Sand and finer material must first be excluded from the grain size distributions, which then must be renormalized for gravel content only, in the case of the Parker (1990) relation. In the case of the Wilcock-Crowe (2003) relation, the sand is retained in the computation.  


<div id=CMT_MODEL_PARAMETERS>
<div id=CMT_MODEL_PARAMETERS>
Line 159: Line 157:


==Main equations==
==Main equations==
* Exner equation of conservation of channel bed sediment
* Characteristic diameter for the ith size range
::::{|
::::{|
|width=530px|<math> \left ( 1 - \lambda _{p} \right ) {\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial t}} = - I_{f} {\frac{\partial q_{bT}}{\partial x}} </math>
|width=530px|<math> D_{i} = \left ( D_{b,i} \ast D_{b,i+1} \right ) ^ \left ( {\frac{1}{2}} \right ) </math>
|width=50p=x align="right"|(1)
|width=50p=x align="right"|(1)
|}
|}
* Characteristic diameter
* The fraction of sample in the ith size range
::::{|
::::{|
|width=530px|<math> D_{i} = \left ( D_{b,i} \ast D_{b,i+1} \right ) ^ \left ( {\frac{1}{2}} \right ) </math>
|width=530px|<math> f_{i} = f_{f,i+1} - f_{f,i} </math>
|width=50p=x align="right"|(2)
|width=50p=x align="right"|(2)
|}
|}
* The conservation of sediment in each grain size range (based on Exner equation)
::::{|
::::{|
|width=530px|<math> f_{i} = f_{f,i+1} - f_{f,i} </math>
|width=530px|<math> \left ( 1 - \lambda _{p} \right ) [L_{a} {\frac{\partial F_{i}}{\partial t}} + \left ( F_{i} - f_{li} \right ) {\frac{\partial L_{a}}{\partial t}}] = -I_{f} {\frac{\partial q_{bT} p_{i}}{\partial x}} + I_{f} f_{li} {\frac{\partial q_{bT}}{\partial x}} </math>
|width=50p=x align="right"|(3)
|width=50p=x align="right"|(3)
|}
|}
* The conservation of sediment in each grain size range
* Fraction of sediment in the ith grain size range at the active-layer substrate interface (if ∂η / ∂t > 0)
::::{|
::::{|
|width=530px|<math> \left ( 1 - \lambda _{p} \right ) [L_{a} {\frac{\partial F_{i}}{\partial t}} + \left ( F_{i} - f_{li} \right ) {\frac{\partial L_{a}}{\partial t}}] = -I_{f} {\frac{\partial q_{bT} p_{i}}{\partial x}} + I_{f} f_{li} {\frac{\partial q_{bT}}{\partial x}} </math>
|width=530px|<math> f_{li} = \left\{\begin{matrix} \alpha F_{i} + \left ( 1 - \alpha \right ) p_{i} & {\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial t}} > 0 \\ f_{sub,i} & {\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial t}} < 0 \end{matrix}\right.</math>
|width=50p=x align="right"|(4)
|width=50p=x align="right"|(4)
|}
* Fraction of sediment in the ith grain size range at the active-layer substrate interface (if ∂η / ∂t > 0)
::::{|
|width=530px|<math> f_{li} = \alpha F_{i} + \left ( 1 - \alpha \right ) p_{i}  </math>
|width=50p=x align="right"|(5)
|}
* Fraction of sediment in the ith grain size range at the active-layer substrate interface (if ∂η / ∂t < 0)
::::{|
|width=530px|<math> f_{li} = f_{sub,i}  </math>
|width=50p=x align="right"|(6)
|}
|}
* Roughness height due to skin friction
* Roughness height due to skin friction
::::{|
::::{|
|width=530px|<math> k_{s} = n_{k} D_{s90}  </math>
|width=530px|<math> k_{s} = n_{k} D_{s90}  </math>
|width=50p=x align="right"|(7)
|width=50p=x align="right"|(5)
|}
|}
* Thickness of the active layer
::::{|
::::{|
|width=530px|<math> L_{a} = n_{a} D_{s90}  </math>
|width=530px|<math> L_{a} = n_{a} D_{s90}  </math>
|width=50p=x align="right"|(8)
|width=50p=x align="right"|(6)
|}
* Non-dimensional bed shear stress
::::{|
|width=530px|<math> \tau _{sg} ^* = {\frac{\tau_{b}}{\left ( \rho _{s} - \rho \right ) g D_{sg}}}  </math>
|width=50p=x align="right"|(9)
|}
|}


Line 209: Line 194:
!Symbol!!Description!!Unit
!Symbol!!Description!!Unit
|-
|-
| q
| Q
| water discharge / width
| flood discharge
| m<sup>2</sup> / s
| L <sup>3</sup> / T
|-
|-
| t
| time step
| T
| T
| gravel input
| m<sup>2</sup> / s
|-
|-
| I
| B
| intermittency
| river width
| -
| L
|-
| D
| grain size of the bed sediment
| L
|-
|-
| e
| D<sub>bi</sub>
| base level
| bound diameter
| m
| L
|-
|-
| S
| λ<sub>p</sub>
| initial bed slope
| bed porosity
| -
| -
|-
|-
| L
| α
| reach length
| the parameter that governs the grain size distribution of the sediment at the active layer-substrate interface during bed aggredation
| m
| -
|-
|-
| t
| F<sub>fi</sub>
| time step
| grain size distribution of the active layer for initial condition
| days
| -
|-
|-
| M
| F<sub>i</sub>
| no. of intervals
| fraction of sediment in the ith grain size range in the active layer
| -
| -
|-
|-
| p
| f<sub>subfi</sub>
| no. of prints
| fraction of sediment in the ith grain size range in the substrate layer for initial condition
| -
| -
|-
|-
| i
| F<sub>fli</sub>
| no. of iterations per print
| percent finer than ith grain size range for the bed surface for initial condition
| -
| -
|-
|-
| k
| F<sub>subfli</sub>
| factor by which Ds90 is multiplied for roughness height
| percent finer than ith grain size range for the substrate layer for initial condition
| -
| -
|-
|-
| n
| f<sub>li</sub>
| factor by which Ds90 is multiplied for active layer thickness
| fraction of sediment in the ith grain size range in the active-layer substrate interface
| -
| -
|-
|-
| r
| p<sub>i</sub>
| coefficient in Manning-Strickler relation
| fraction of sediment in the ith grain size range in the bedload
| -
| -
|-
|-
| R
| F<sub>sub,i</sub>
| submerged specific gravity of gravel
| fraction of substrate material in the ith size range
| -
| -
|-
|-
| l
| D<sub>s90</sub>
| bed porosity, gravel
| the diameter of the bed surface such that the 90% of the sediment is finer
| L
|-
| n<sub>a</sub>
| user specified order-one non dimensional constant
| -
| -
|-
|-
| u
| p<sub>ffi</sub>
| upwinding coefficient for load spatial deviations in Exner equation (> 0.5 suggested)
| the percent that is finer than the ith size range for upstream boundary conditon
| -
| -
|-
|-
| a
| η<sub>d</sub>
| coefficient for material transferred to substrate as bed aggrades
| fixed bed elevation at the downstream end of the modeled reach
| L
|-
| k<sub>c</sub>
| composite roughness height
| L
|-
| G
| imposed annual sediment transfer rate from upstream
| M / L
|-
| G<sub>tf</sub>
| upstream sediment feed rate
| -
| -
|-
|-
| C
| ξ<sub>d</sub>
| coefficient, Cf, in the Chezy formulation
| downstream water surface elevation
| L
|-
| L
| length of reach under consideration
| L
|-
| q<sub>w</sub>
| water discharge per unit width
| L<sup>2</sup> / T
|-
| i
| number of time steps per printout
| -
| -
|-
|-
| q<sub>w</sub>
| p
| the characteristic flood discharge per unit channel width
| number of printouts desired
| -
| -
|-
|-
| I<sub>f</sub>
| M
| flood intermittency
| number of spatial intervals
| -
| -
|-
|-
| q<sub>bTf</sub>
| R
| the volumetric gravel input rate per unit channel width
| submerged specific gravity of sediment
| -
| -
|-
|-
| η<sub>d</sub>
| S<sub>f</sub>
| the downstream bed elevation
| friction slope
| m
|- 
| λ<sub>p</sub>
| the bed porosity
| -
| -
|-
|-
| S<sub>l</sub>
| F<sub>r</sub>
| the initial bed slope
| Froude number
| -
| -
|-
|-
| D<sub>bi</sub>
| U
| the bound diameter
| flow velocity
| L / T
|-
| g
| acceleration of gravity
| L/ T<sup>2</sup>
|-
| α<sub>r</sub>
| coefficient in Manning-Stricker, dimensionless coefficient between 8 and 9
| -
| -
|-
|-
| k<sub>s</sub>
| grain roughness
| L
|- 
| n<sub>k</sub>
| n<sub>k</sub>
| dimensionless coefficient typically between 2 and 5
| dimensionless coefficient typically between 2 and 5
| -
| -
|-  
|-
| Δt
| τ<sup>*</sup>
| time step
| Shield number
| year
| -
|-
| ρ
| fluid density
| M / L<sup>3</sup>
|-
| ρ<sub>s</sub>
| sediment density
| M / L<sup>3</sup>
|-
|-
| Ntoprint
| τ<sub>c</sub>
| number of time steps to printout
| critical Shields number for the onset of sediment motion
| -
| -
|-
|-
| Nprint
| ψ<sub>s</sub>
| number of printouts
| the fraction of bed shear stress
| -
| -
|-
|-
| a<sub>U</sub>
| q<sub>t</sub> <sup>*</sup>
| upwinding coefficient (1=full upwind, 0.5=central difference)
| Einstein number
| -
| -
|-
|-
| α<sub>r</sub>
| I<sub>f</sub>
| coefficient to compute the roughness height
| flood intermittency
| -
| -
|-
|-
| n<sub>a</sub>
| t<sub>f</sub>
| coefficient to compute the thickness of the active layer
| cumulative time the river has been in flood
| -
| T
|-
| G<sub>t</sub>
| the annual sediment yield
| M / T
|-
|-
| α
| t<sub>a</sub>
| the parameter that governs the grain size distribution of the sediment at the active layer-substrate interface during bed aggradation
| the number of seconds in a year
| -
| -
|-
|-
| x
| Q<sub>f</sub>
| downstream coordinate
| sediment transport rate during flood discharge
| m
|-
|-
| Sl
| α<sub>t</sub>
| slope of the bed surface
| dimensionless coefficient in the sediment transport equation, equals to 8
| -
| -
|-
|-
| u<sub>*</sub>
| n<sub>t</sub>
| shear velocity
| exponent in sediment transport relation, equals to 1.5
| m / s
| -
|-
|-
| p<sub>feed</sub>
| τ<sub>c</sub> <sup>*</sup>
| GSD of the feed
| reference Shields number in sediment transport relation, equals to 0.047
| tons / year
|-
|-
| F<sub>fs</sub>
| C<sub>f</sub>
| GSD of the substrate
| bed friction coefficient, equals to τ<sub>b</sub> / (ρ U<sup>2</sup> )
| -
| -
|-
|-
| F<sub>f</sub>
| C<sub>Z</sub>
| GSD of the final surface
| dimensionless Chezy resistance coefficient.
|-
| S<sub>l</sub>
| initial bed slope of the river
| -
| -
|-
|-
| η
| η<sub>i</sub>
| bed elevation
| initial bed elevation
| m
| L
|-
| D<sub>sub50</sub>
| median size of the substrate layer
| L
|-
| D<sub>subg</sub>
| geometric mean size of the substrate layer
| L
|-
| L<sub>a</sub>
| thickness of the active layer
| L
|-
| x
| downstream coordinate
| L
|-
|-
| f<sub>fi</sub>
| τ
| the mass fraction of the sample that is finer than D<sub>bi</sub>
| shear stress on bed surface
| -
| -
|-
|-
| f<sub>i</sub>
| q<sub>b</sub>
| the fraction of sample in the ith size range
| bed material load
| -
| M / T
|-
|-
| p<sub>i</sub>
| Δx
| the fraction of sediment in the ith grain size range in the bedload
| spatial step length, equals to L / M
| -
| L
|-
|-
| α
| Q<sub>w</sub>
| a user specified parameter
| flood discharge
| -
| L<sup>3</sup> / T
|-
|-
| f<sub>sub,i</sub>
| Δt
| the fraction of substrate material in the ith range
| time step
| -
| T
|-
|-
| ψ<sub>s</sub>
| Ntoprint
| boundary shear stress due to skin friction
| number of time steps to printout
| -
| -
|-
|-
| k<sub>c</sub>
| Nprint
| composite roughness height for the Manning-Strickler formulation
| number of printouts
| -
| -
|-
|-
| k<sub>s</sub>
| a<sub>U</sub>
| roughness height due to skin friction
| upwinding coefficient (1=full upwind, 0.5=central difference)
| -
| -
|-
|-
| F<sub>fi</sub>
| α<sub>s</sub>
| grain size distributions of the active layer
| coefficient in sediment transport relation
| -
| -
|-
|-
Line 410: Line 464:
{| {{Prettytable}} class="wikitable sortable"
{| {{Prettytable}} class="wikitable sortable"
!Symbol!!Description!!Unit
!Symbol!!Description!!Unit
|-
| η
| bed surface elevatioon
| L
|-
|-
| H
| H
| water depth
| water depth
| m
| L
|-
|-
| τ<sub>sg</sub>
| τ<sub>b</sub>
| shear stress on the bed surface
| bed shear stress
| N / m<sup>2</sup>
| M / (T<sup>2</sup> L)
|-
|-
| η
| S
| bed surface elevation
| bed slope
| m
| -
|-
|-
| q<sub>bT</sub>
| q<sub>t</sub>
| bedload transport rate
| total bed material load
| m<sup>2</sup> / s
| L<sup>2</sup> / T
|-
| q<sub>bTf</sub>
| upstream feed rate
| tons / year
|-
| D<sub>sg</sub>
| geometric mean grain size on the bed surface
| mm
|-
| D<sub>s90</sub>
| the diameter such that 90% of the bed surface is finer
| mm
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 444: Line 490:


==Notes==
==Notes==
The program AgDegNormGravMixPW is an extension of AgDegNormal for sediment mixtures in gravel bed rivers where the channel bed material is transported as bedload only. Gravel-bed rivers tend to be poorly-sorted.  During floods, bed material load consists almost exclusively of bedload.  (Sand is often transported in copious quantities as washload during floods.)  The surface material (armor or pavement) tends to be coarser than the substrate.  By definition the median size D<sub>sub50</sub> or geometric mean size D<sub>subg</sub> of the substrate is in the gravel range, but the substrate may contain up to 30% sand in the interstices of an otherwise clast-supported deposit.  
This program computes the time evolution of the long profile of a river of constant width carrying a mixture of gravel sizes, the downstream end of which has a prescribed elevation. In particular, the program computes the time evolution of the spatial profiles of bed elevation, total gravel bedload transport rate and grain size distribution of the surface (active) layer of the bed.
 
Gravel-bed rivers tend to be poorly-sorted.  During floods, bed material load consists almost exclusively of bedload.  (Sand is often transported in copious quantities as washload during floods.)  The surface material (armor or pavement) tends to be coarser than the substrate.  By definition the median size or geometric mean size of the substrate is in the gravel range, but the substrate may contain up to 30% sand in the interstices of an otherwise clast-supported deposit.
 
The grain size distribution of the bed material is specified in terms of 12 size bounds, Dbi with i = 1 …12, such that f<sub>fi</sub> denotes the mass fraction of the sample that is finer than D<sub>bi</sub>.  The 12 bound diameters specify 11 grain size ranges defined by (D<sub>b,i</sub>, D<sub>b,i+1</sub>) and (f<sub>f,i</sub>, f<sub>f,i+1</sub>).  For each size range the model computes the characteristic diameter and the fraction of sample in the ith size range.


The grain size distributions of the sediment feed, initial surface material and substrate material must be specified. It is assumed that the grain size distribution of the sediment feed rate does not change in time, the initial grain size distribution of the surface material is the same at every node, the grain size distribution of the substrate is the same at every node and does not vary in the vertical. These constraints are easy to relax.
The flow is assumed normal and the water depth can be computed with either a Manning-Strickler or a Chezy formulation can be used.


The program does not store the vertical and streamwise structure of the new substrate created as the bed aggrades. It is assumed that the grain size distribution of the sediment feed rate does not change in time, the initial grain size distribution of the surface material is the same at every node, the grain size distribution of the substrate is the same at every node and does notvary in the vertical.  These constraints are easy to relax.
The exchange of sediment between the bedload and the bed deposit is modeled with a two-layer model for the channel bed. The bed deposit is divided in two regions, 1) the substrate and 2) the active (or surface or armor) layer.


The program does not store the vertical and streamwise structure of the new substrate created as the bed aggrades. As a result, is cannot capture the case of aggradation followed by degradation.  Again, the constraint is easy to relax, but at the price of increased memory requirements for storing the newly-created substrate.
The grain size distribution of the active layer is assumed to be constant in the vertical and it may vary in the streamwise direction and in time, i.e. the active layer is assumed well-mixed.  The grain size distribution of the substrate, in principle, may vary in both streamwise and vertical direction, but it is constant in time.  The only way the grain size distribution of the substrate may vary in time is by creating new substrate via bed aggradation. In the present model, the grain size distribution of the substrate is assumed to be constant in space and in time, therefore it works only for the cases of aggradation always and everywhere or degradation always and everywhere.  In the case of aggradation followed by degradation, it is necessary to modify the code so that the vertical variation of the grain size distribution of the new substrate created by aggradation is stored in memory.
 
No attempt is made in this code to decompose the bed resistance into skin friction and form dragThe constant to convert total boundary shear stress to that due to skin friction, ψ<sub>s</sub>, is set equal to 1 and consequently the composite roughness height for the Manning-Strickler formulation, k<sub>c</sub>, is equal to the roughness height due to skin friction k<sub>s</sub>.  The roughness height and the thickness of the active layer are computed with the liner functions of the diameter of the bed surface such that the 90% of the sediment is finer.
 
To compute the bedload transport rate the user can choose from two surface-based bedload transport formulations; those of Parker (1990) and Wilcock and Crowe (2003).  In the relation of Parker (1990) the surface grain size distributions need to be renormalized to exclude sand before specification as input to the program.  This step is neither necessary nor desirable in the case of the relation of Wilcock and Crowe (2003), where the sand plays an important role in mediating the gravel bedload transport.


The flow is calculated using the normal flow (local equilibrium) approximation.


The river is assumed to be morphologically active only intermittently (during floods); this condition is specified in terms of an intermittency If < 1 expressing the fraction of time the river is in flood.
The program does not store the vertical and streamwise structure of the new substrate created as the bed aggrades.It is assumed in the model that the grain size distribution of the sediment feed rate does not change in time, the initial grain size distribution of the surface material is the same at every node, the grain size distribution of the substrate is the same at every node and does not vary in the vertical.


In performing the calculation, the following control parameters must be specified:
The flow is calculated using the normal flow (local equilibrium) approximation.  
M = number of spatial intervals, so that the spatial step length = L/M; dt = time step length; Ntoprint = number of time steps to a printout; Nprint = number of printouts in the calculation.  


* Note on model running
* Note on model running
Line 474: Line 526:


<span class="remove_this_tag">Follow the next steps to include images / movies of simulations:</span>
<span class="remove_this_tag">Follow the next steps to include images / movies of simulations:</span>
* <span class="remove_this_tag">Upload file: http://csdms.colorado.edu/wiki/Special:Upload</span>
* <span class="remove_this_tag">Upload file: https://csdms.colorado.edu/wiki/Special:Upload</span>
* <span class="remove_this_tag">Create link to the file on your page: <nowiki>[[Image:<file name>]]</nowiki>.</span>
* <span class="remove_this_tag">Create link to the file on your page: <nowiki>[[Image:<file name>]]</nowiki>.</span>


Line 489: Line 541:


==Links==
==Links==
* [[http://csdms.colorado.edu/wiki/Model:AgDegNormGravMixPW Model:AgDegNormGravMixPW]]
* [[Model:AgDegNormGravMixPW]]
* [[Model_help:AgDegNormal]]


[[Category:Utility components]]
[[Category:Utility components]]

Latest revision as of 17:17, 19 February 2018

The CSDMS Help System

AgDegNormGravMixPW

This is the calculator for aggradation and degradation of sediment mixtures in gravel-bed streams.

Model introduction

The program AgDegNormGravMixPW is an extension of AgDegNormal for sediment mixtures in gravel bed rivers where the channel bed material is transported as bedload only.

Model parameters

Parameter Description Unit
Input directory path to input files
Site prefix Site prefix for Input/Output files
Case prefix Case prefix for Input/Output files
Parameter Description Unit
Chezy Or Manning, Chezy-1 or Manning-2
Bedload relation, Parker or Wilock, Parker-1 or Wilock-2
Parameter Description Unit
Flood discharge m3 / s
gravel input m2 / s
Intermittency -
base level m
initial bed slope -
reach length m
Time step days
no. of intervals(100 or less) -
Number of printouts -
Iterations per each printout -
factor by which Ds90 is multiplied for roughness height -
factor by which Ds90 is multiplied for active layer thickness -
Manning-Strickler coefficient r
Submerged specific gravity of sediment
bed porosity, gravel
upwinding coefficient for load spatial derivatives in Exner equation (> 0.5 suggested)
coefficient for material transferred to substrate as bed aggrades
Chezy resistance coefficient -
Parameter Description Unit
Model name name of the model -
Author name name of the model author -

Uses ports

This will be something that the CSDMS facility will add

Provides ports

This will be something that the CSDMS facility will add

Main equations

  • Characteristic diameter for the ith size range
[math]\displaystyle{ D_{i} = \left ( D_{b,i} \ast D_{b,i+1} \right ) ^ \left ( {\frac{1}{2}} \right ) }[/math] (1)
  • The fraction of sample in the ith size range
[math]\displaystyle{ f_{i} = f_{f,i+1} - f_{f,i} }[/math] (2)
  • The conservation of sediment in each grain size range (based on Exner equation)
[math]\displaystyle{ \left ( 1 - \lambda _{p} \right ) [L_{a} {\frac{\partial F_{i}}{\partial t}} + \left ( F_{i} - f_{li} \right ) {\frac{\partial L_{a}}{\partial t}}] = -I_{f} {\frac{\partial q_{bT} p_{i}}{\partial x}} + I_{f} f_{li} {\frac{\partial q_{bT}}{\partial x}} }[/math] (3)
  • Fraction of sediment in the ith grain size range at the active-layer substrate interface (if ∂η / ∂t > 0)
[math]\displaystyle{ f_{li} = \left\{\begin{matrix} \alpha F_{i} + \left ( 1 - \alpha \right ) p_{i} & {\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial t}} \gt 0 \\ f_{sub,i} & {\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial t}} \lt 0 \end{matrix}\right. }[/math] (4)
  • Roughness height due to skin friction
[math]\displaystyle{ k_{s} = n_{k} D_{s90} }[/math] (5)
  • Thickness of the active layer
[math]\displaystyle{ L_{a} = n_{a} D_{s90} }[/math] (6)

Notes

This program computes the time evolution of the long profile of a river of constant width carrying a mixture of gravel sizes, the downstream end of which has a prescribed elevation. In particular, the program computes the time evolution of the spatial profiles of bed elevation, total gravel bedload transport rate and grain size distribution of the surface (active) layer of the bed.

Gravel-bed rivers tend to be poorly-sorted. During floods, bed material load consists almost exclusively of bedload. (Sand is often transported in copious quantities as washload during floods.) The surface material (armor or pavement) tends to be coarser than the substrate. By definition the median size or geometric mean size of the substrate is in the gravel range, but the substrate may contain up to 30% sand in the interstices of an otherwise clast-supported deposit.

The grain size distribution of the bed material is specified in terms of 12 size bounds, Dbi with i = 1 …12, such that ffi denotes the mass fraction of the sample that is finer than Dbi. The 12 bound diameters specify 11 grain size ranges defined by (Db,i, Db,i+1) and (ff,i, ff,i+1). For each size range the model computes the characteristic diameter and the fraction of sample in the ith size range.

The flow is assumed normal and the water depth can be computed with either a Manning-Strickler or a Chezy formulation can be used.

The exchange of sediment between the bedload and the bed deposit is modeled with a two-layer model for the channel bed. The bed deposit is divided in two regions, 1) the substrate and 2) the active (or surface or armor) layer.

The grain size distribution of the active layer is assumed to be constant in the vertical and it may vary in the streamwise direction and in time, i.e. the active layer is assumed well-mixed. The grain size distribution of the substrate, in principle, may vary in both streamwise and vertical direction, but it is constant in time. The only way the grain size distribution of the substrate may vary in time is by creating new substrate via bed aggradation. In the present model, the grain size distribution of the substrate is assumed to be constant in space and in time, therefore it works only for the cases of aggradation always and everywhere or degradation always and everywhere. In the case of aggradation followed by degradation, it is necessary to modify the code so that the vertical variation of the grain size distribution of the new substrate created by aggradation is stored in memory.

No attempt is made in this code to decompose the bed resistance into skin friction and form drag. The constant to convert total boundary shear stress to that due to skin friction, ψs, is set equal to 1 and consequently the composite roughness height for the Manning-Strickler formulation, kc, is equal to the roughness height due to skin friction ks. The roughness height and the thickness of the active layer are computed with the liner functions of the diameter of the bed surface such that the 90% of the sediment is finer.

To compute the bedload transport rate the user can choose from two surface-based bedload transport formulations; those of Parker (1990) and Wilcock and Crowe (2003). In the relation of Parker (1990) the surface grain size distributions need to be renormalized to exclude sand before specification as input to the program. This step is neither necessary nor desirable in the case of the relation of Wilcock and Crowe (2003), where the sand plays an important role in mediating the gravel bedload transport.


The program does not store the vertical and streamwise structure of the new substrate created as the bed aggrades.It is assumed in the model that the grain size distribution of the sediment feed rate does not change in time, the initial grain size distribution of the surface material is the same at every node, the grain size distribution of the substrate is the same at every node and does not vary in the vertical.

The flow is calculated using the normal flow (local equilibrium) approximation.

  • Note on model running

In the case of the load relation due to Parker (1990), the grain size distributions are automatically renormalized because the relation is for the transport of gravel only in the case of the load relation due to Wilcock-Crowe (2003), the sand and the fine sediment are retained for the computation

The user will be prompted by the program as to which bedload relation he would like to use.

The input grain size distributions may be on a 0-100% or a 0.00-1.00 scale, and the program will automatically scale.

The input grain size distributions must have bounds at 0% and 100% (1.00) to properly perform the calculation. If the user does not input the bounds the program will automatically interpolate upper and lower bounds DbU and DbL such that ffU = 100 (1.00) and ffL = 0

The water depth is calculated using a Chézy formulation, when only the Chézy coefficient is specified in the input text file. The Manning-Strickler formulation is implemented, when only the coefficients αr and nk are given in the inputfile. When all the three parameters are present, the program will ask the user which formulation they would like to use.

Examples

An example run with input parameters, BLD files, as well as a figure / movie of the output

Follow the next steps to include images / movies of simulations:

See also: Help:Images or Help:Movies

Developer(s)

Gary Parker

References

Parker, G., 1990, Surface-based bedload transport relation for gravel rivers, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 28(4): 417-436.

Wilcock, P. R., and Crowe, J. C., 2003, Surface-based transport model for mixed-size sediment, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 129(2), 120-128.


Links