CSDMS 2013 annual meeting poster Celso Ferreira: Difference between revisions

From CSDMS
(Created page with "__NOTOC__<div style="width:800px; float:left; background:#e0e0e0; padding:5px;"> <div style="float:right;"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE:10pt" color="#ffffff">''Presentation provide...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 8: Line 8:
'''Abstract:'''
'''Abstract:'''


On earth, landscape morphology is mainly controlled by rivers evolutions and their interactions with hillslopes. But hydrographic network may be re-organized by stream capture and modify deeply the relief. This transition may be induced by several mechanisms (diversion, headward erosion, avulsion, or subterranean filling up). It has interested numerous scientists since a long time (Davis 1895, Blache 1943, Lesson-Quinif 2001 & Le Roux-Harmand 1997-2009…). Here we focus on stream piracies by headward erosion, when an actively eroding low level stream (called the captor) encroaches on the drainage of a nearby stream flowing at a higher level (called the diverter) and diverts part of the water of the higher stream.
Hurricanes are one of the most costly natural disasters impacting US coastal areas. Recent studies point towards an increase in damages caused by hurricanes, resulting from sea-level rise (SLR), possible hurricane intensification due to a warmer climate and increasing coastal populations. The SLR is one of the most significant factors of climate change that will impact coastal areas. Besides geometrical changes in coastal bays (i.e., deeper water depth and larger surface area), SLR is also expected to have substantial impacts on the patterns and process of coastal wetlands, thereby affecting surge generation and propagation inside the bays. We analyzed the impacts of SLR on hurricane storm surges, structural building damage, and population and businesses affected for coastal bays located on the Texas central coast. To evaluate the effects of SLR on surges, we considered its impacts on changes in land cover and bay geometry caused by SLR. The analyses were conducted using the hydrodynamic model ADCIRC and a wind and pressure field model (PBL) representing the physical properties of historical hurricane Bret and hypothetical storms. The effects of land cover change were represented within ADCIRC by the changes in the frictional drag at the sea bottom and changes in momentum transfer from the wind to the water column caused by vegetation losses. Simulations were performed using a high-resolution unstructured numerical mesh to study surge response in communities along the coastal bays of Texas. First, we evaluated the impacts of land cover changes due to SLR on the surge response. Second, we evaluated the impacts of neglecting land cover changes due to SLR on the surge response. Finally, we evaluated the overall effect of SLR on the mean maximum surge and the consequent extent of the flooded areas.  
During the last decades, several landscapes evolution models (LEM) have been developed to quantify the topography evolution with diffusion and advection equations. These models play an important role in sharpening our thinking to better understand the interaction between landscape evolution processes. LEM were developed basically to simulate erosion, tectonic and climate at different scales of time and space. But, these models were not designed to describe specific mechanisms as the stream capture. It’s one of the aims of this work to evaluate LEM for this purpose.
Although the overall impacts of SLR on surge (i.e.: water elevation above mean water level) are highly dependent on storm conditions and specific locations within the study area, we showed that the mean maximum surge (spatial average within each bay) increases with SLR. The overall mean maximum surge within the study area increased on average approximately 0.1 m (SLR of 0.5 m) and 0.7 m (SLR of 2.0 m). Simulations neglecting land cover changes due to SLR did significantly underestimate the expected structural damage for buildings. This difference increased with SLR and was affected by the storm meteorological conditions. Stronger and faster storms were associated with higher underestimation. Although considering land cover changes resulted in an overall damage increase, for SLR below 0.5 m, this increase was almost negligible. As a result, the land cover changes arising from SLR are important for damage estimation considering SLR scenarios over at least 0.5 m. For example, when considering a SLR of 0.6 m, based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (2007) high emission scenario, we demonstrated a 10% increase in building structural damage. The assimilation of land cover changes is especially important when calculating expected damages from high SLR scenarios. If a SLR of 2.0 m is assumed, a 35% increase in the expected structural damage to buildings is estimated. In summary, the changes in coastal bay geometry and land cover caused by SLR play an important role in the resulting surge response. The variability of the surge response is also greatly affected by location and the characteristics of the storm.
In this paper, we develop a 1D model based on LEM equations to investigate the stream piracy by headward erosion responses to climatic or tectonic changes. This model incorporates the most common equations used in quantitative geomorphology; diffusion in hillslope, advection in river (detachment-limited mode) and an inequality based on slope and drainage area for the limit between these two domains (Montgomery and Dietrich, 1988). First, simulations on analytical cases highlight the stream head progression mechanism, and the results indicate that this progression rate is mainly controlled by the slope at the captor source. Consequently, the aggradation of the diverter or (and) the incision of the captor accelerate the process. Then, a predictive study with an improved version of GOLEM (software developed by Tucker & Slingerland in 1994) on the Meuse basin shows that several piracies may probably occur in the future. A comparison with the 1D model gives similar results.
The simplicity and the flexibility of the 1D model allow complex simulations in the Meuse basin taking into account: lithological differences of outcropping layers, Meuse deposition tendency, etc. Once the 2D simulations or topography analysis locate potential captures, 1D simulation may intensively be used, as it presents many advantages; weak execution time, simple limits conditions setting, less time for data preparation, etc. Consequently, a sensitivity analysis to estimate piracies ages is realized with the developed 1D model.


<font color="red">*</font><small> ''Please acknowledge the original contributors when you are using this material. If there are any copyright issues, please let us know and we will respond as soon as possible.''</small>
<font color="red">*</font><small> ''Please acknowledge the original contributors when you are using this material. If there are any copyright issues, please let us know and we will respond as soon as possible.''</small>


</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 09:22, 28 March 2013

Presentation provided during CSDMS annual meeting 2013

Implications of land-cover changes caused by sea-level rise on hurricane storm surge damage

Celso Ferreira, George Mason University Fairfax Virginia, United States. cferrei3@gmu.edu

Abstract:

Hurricanes are one of the most costly natural disasters impacting US coastal areas. Recent studies point towards an increase in damages caused by hurricanes, resulting from sea-level rise (SLR), possible hurricane intensification due to a warmer climate and increasing coastal populations. The SLR is one of the most significant factors of climate change that will impact coastal areas. Besides geometrical changes in coastal bays (i.e., deeper water depth and larger surface area), SLR is also expected to have substantial impacts on the patterns and process of coastal wetlands, thereby affecting surge generation and propagation inside the bays. We analyzed the impacts of SLR on hurricane storm surges, structural building damage, and population and businesses affected for coastal bays located on the Texas central coast. To evaluate the effects of SLR on surges, we considered its impacts on changes in land cover and bay geometry caused by SLR. The analyses were conducted using the hydrodynamic model ADCIRC and a wind and pressure field model (PBL) representing the physical properties of historical hurricane Bret and hypothetical storms. The effects of land cover change were represented within ADCIRC by the changes in the frictional drag at the sea bottom and changes in momentum transfer from the wind to the water column caused by vegetation losses. Simulations were performed using a high-resolution unstructured numerical mesh to study surge response in communities along the coastal bays of Texas. First, we evaluated the impacts of land cover changes due to SLR on the surge response. Second, we evaluated the impacts of neglecting land cover changes due to SLR on the surge response. Finally, we evaluated the overall effect of SLR on the mean maximum surge and the consequent extent of the flooded areas. Although the overall impacts of SLR on surge (i.e.: water elevation above mean water level) are highly dependent on storm conditions and specific locations within the study area, we showed that the mean maximum surge (spatial average within each bay) increases with SLR. The overall mean maximum surge within the study area increased on average approximately 0.1 m (SLR of 0.5 m) and 0.7 m (SLR of 2.0 m). Simulations neglecting land cover changes due to SLR did significantly underestimate the expected structural damage for buildings. This difference increased with SLR and was affected by the storm meteorological conditions. Stronger and faster storms were associated with higher underestimation. Although considering land cover changes resulted in an overall damage increase, for SLR below 0.5 m, this increase was almost negligible. As a result, the land cover changes arising from SLR are important for damage estimation considering SLR scenarios over at least 0.5 m. For example, when considering a SLR of 0.6 m, based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (2007) high emission scenario, we demonstrated a 10% increase in building structural damage. The assimilation of land cover changes is especially important when calculating expected damages from high SLR scenarios. If a SLR of 2.0 m is assumed, a 35% increase in the expected structural damage to buildings is estimated. In summary, the changes in coastal bay geometry and land cover caused by SLR play an important role in the resulting surge response. The variability of the surge response is also greatly affected by location and the characteristics of the storm.

* Please acknowledge the original contributors when you are using this material. If there are any copyright issues, please let us know and we will respond as soon as possible.