2022 CSDMS meeting-094: Difference between revisions

From CSDMS
(Created page with "{{CSDMS meeting personal information template-2022 |CSDMS meeting first name=Jeffrey |CSDMS meeting last name=Keck |CSDMS meeting institute=University of Washington |CSDMS mee...")
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting select clinics1 2022
{{CSDMS meeting select clinics1 2022
|CSDMS_meeting_select_clinics1_2022=2) Variable resolution mesh based flow direction and hydrologic modeling: An introduction to HexWatershed
|CSDMS_meeting_select_clinics1_2022=3) The Art of Modeling
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting select clinics2 2022
{{CSDMS meeting select clinics2 2022
Line 16: Line 16:
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting select clinics3 2022
{{CSDMS meeting select clinics3 2022
|CSDMS_meeting_select_clinics3_2022=4) Publishing Reproducible Computational Research with the Whole Tale
|CSDMS_meeting_select_clinics3_2022=1) Component Creation with Landlab
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract yes no 2022
{{CSDMS meeting abstract yes no 2022
Line 35: Line 35:
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template 2022
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template 2022
|CSDMS meeting abstract=In the same way that watersheds filter precipitation signals into a time series of flow response, watersheds also filter sediment production signals into a time series of bedload transport. Here, we describe the Mass Wasting Router, a new watershed-scale sediment production and transport model written in Landlab that couples an existing shallow landslide hazard model (LandslideProbability) with an existing network-scale bedload transport model (NetworkSedimentTransporter) by (1) delineating hillslope scale landslides from maps of landslide probability, (2) routing the landslides through the watershed using a “precipiton” or “agent” style model and (3) fluvially eroding the mass wasting deposits and creating parcels for the NetworkSedimentTransporter. Preliminary model runs appear to show that variation in soil cohesion and precipitation intensity drive landslide-derived hillslope sediment production rates but valley storage processes, driven by debris flow deposition patterns, modulate the rate that sediment reaches the basin outlet.
|CSDMS meeting abstract=In the same way that watersheds filter precipitation signals into a time series of flow response, watersheds also filter sediment production signals into a time series of bedload transport. Here, we describe the Mass Wasting Router, a new watershed-scale sediment production and transport model written for Landlab that couples an existing shallow landslide hazard model (LandslideProbability) with an existing network-scale bedload transport model (NetworkSedimentTransporter) by (1) delineating hillslope scale landslides from maps of landslide probability, (2) routing the landslides through the watershed using a “precipiton” or “agent” style model and (3) fluvially eroding the mass wasting deposits and creating parcels for the NetworkSedimentTransporter. Preliminary model runs indicate that variation in soil cohesion and precipitation intensity drive landslide-derived hillslope sediment production rates but valley storage processes, driven by debris flow deposition patterns, modulate bedload transport rates at the basin outlet.
}}
}}
{{blank line template}}
{{blank line template}}

Latest revision as of 10:40, 13 May 2022



(if you haven't already)




Log in (or create account for non-CSDMS members)
Forgot username? Search or email:CSDMSweb@colorado.edu


Browse  abstracts


Mass Wasting Router: A watershed-scale sediment production and transport model

Jeffrey Keck, University of Washington Seattle Washington, United States. keckje@gmail.com
Erkan Istanbulluoglu, University of Washington Seattle Washington, United States. erkani@uw.edu



In the same way that watersheds filter precipitation signals into a time series of flow response, watersheds also filter sediment production signals into a time series of bedload transport. Here, we describe the Mass Wasting Router, a new watershed-scale sediment production and transport model written for Landlab that couples an existing shallow landslide hazard model (LandslideProbability) with an existing network-scale bedload transport model (NetworkSedimentTransporter) by (1) delineating hillslope scale landslides from maps of landslide probability, (2) routing the landslides through the watershed using a “precipiton” or “agent” style model and (3) fluvially eroding the mass wasting deposits and creating parcels for the NetworkSedimentTransporter. Preliminary model runs indicate that variation in soil cohesion and precipitation intensity drive landslide-derived hillslope sediment production rates but valley storage processes, driven by debris flow deposition patterns, modulate bedload transport rates at the basin outlet.