2019 CSDMS meeting-078

From CSDMS
Revision as of 12:47, 15 February 2019 by Awild (talk | contribs)





Log in (or create account for non-CSDMS members)
Forgot username? Search or email:CSDMSweb@colorado.edu



Browse  abstracts



Skeena River Estuary and Marine Approaches: Patterns and Rates of Sedimentation

Amanda Wild, University of Victoria Victoria , Canada. awild@uvic.ca
David Lintern, Pacific Geoscience Center Victoria , Canada. gwyn.lintern@canada.ca
Kim Conway, Pacific Geoscience Center Victoria , Canada. kim.conway@canada.ca


Natural Resources Canada marine geoscience surveys have acquired multibeam and acoustic backscatter datasets, piston cores, and grab samples across the Skeena Estuary and the contiguous marine areas. Data from these cruises have been compiled to produce an overview of seabed geomorphology, texture and sedimentations rates in the estuary and marine approaches. The model HydroTrend was used to estimate incoming sediment load from the Skeena River. Model estimates for suspended sediments are higher than past estimates due to a large contribution of suspended sediment predicted within a portion of the Skeena watershed previously excluded due to a lack of available hydrographic data. At the same distance from the river mouth, sedimentation rates of 2.9 cm/yr estimated with the SedFlux model using HydroTrend sediment load results were similar to sedimentation rates of 2.75 cm/yr in Ogden Channel derived from radiocarbon-dated sediment cores. Cores recovered mud sequences in Ogden Channel, proximal to the Base Sands, and within Marcus Passage where radiocarbon dates indicated that indicated sedimentation rates were as high as 2.83cm/yr. In comparison, sedimentation rates further offshore in Chatham Sound are as low as 0.004cm/yr. A relatively high sedimentation rate, seaward fining trends in grain size, and very poorly sorted sediments with a dominant presence of fine sediments were interpreted as indicators of high riverine input to the seabed regionally