2019 CSDMS meeting-078: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{CSDMS meeting personal information template-2019 |CSDMS meeting first name=Amanda |CSDMS meeting last name=Wild |CSDMS meeting institute=University of Victoria |CSDMS meetin...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|CSDMS meeting city=Victoria | |CSDMS meeting city=Victoria | ||
|CSDMS meeting country=Canada | |CSDMS meeting country=Canada | ||
|CSDMS meeting email address= | |CSDMS meeting email address=awild@uvic.ca | ||
|CSDMS meeting phone=7783506124 | |CSDMS meeting phone=7783506124 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|CSDMS meeting abstract submit=Yes | |CSDMS meeting abstract submit=Yes | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title temp2019}} | {{CSDMS meeting abstract title temp2019 | ||
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template 2019}} | |CSDMS meeting abstract title=Patterns and Rates of Sedimentation in a Bedrock Confined Estuary: The Skeena River Estuary and Marine Approaches | ||
}} | |||
{{CSDMS meeting authors template | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Eva | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Kwoll | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=University of Victoria | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Victoria | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=Canada | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=ekwoll@uvic.ca | |||
}} | |||
{{CSDMS meeting authors template | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Gwyn | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Lintern | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Pacific Geoscience Center | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Sidney | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=Canada | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=gwyn.lintern@canada.ca | |||
}} | |||
{{CSDMS meeting authors template | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Kim | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Conway | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Pacific Geoscience Center | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Sidney | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=Canada | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=kim.conway@canada.ca | |||
}} | |||
{{CSDMS meeting authors template | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Vaughn | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Barrie | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Pacific Geoscience Center | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Sidney | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=Canada | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=vaughn.barrie@canada.ca | |||
}} | |||
{{CSDMS meeting authors template | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Robert | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Kung | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Pacific Geoscience Center | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Sidney | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=Canada | |||
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=robert.kung@canada.ca | |||
}} | |||
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template 2019 | |||
|CSDMS meeting abstract=This study investigates riverine sediment dispersal within a bedrock confined estuary in British Columbia, Canada using the HydroTrend and Sedflux models. The models are evaluated using multibeam and acoustic backscatter surveys, piston cores, and grab samples across the Skeena Estuary and its contiguous marine areas. The data has been compiled to produce an overview of seabed geomorphology, texture, and sedimentation rates in the estuary and marine approaches. The model HydroTrend was used to estimate incoming sediment load from the Skeena River. Model estimates of suspended sediment load are higher than past estimates due to a large contribution of suspended sediment from a portion of the Skeena watershed previously excluded due to a lack of available hydrographic data. Over thirty kilometres from the river mouth, cores recovered mud sequences in the deeper proximal bedrock confined channels that indicated sedimentation rates of up to 2.83 cm yr-1. These deeper estuarine passages are seaward of the sandy deposits that make up the delta platform. In comparison, sedimentation rates in the further offshore marine approaches to the Skeena Estuary are as low as 0.004 cm/yr. Sedimentation rates within the estuary agree with the SedFlux model outputs using the HydroTrend sediment load results. More specifically, a sedimentation rate of 2.9 cm/yr was predicted using the SedFlux model at the same distance from the river mouth as the mud sequence radiocarbon dated cores. A relatively high sedimentation rate and seaward fining trend in grain size are interpreted as indicators of high riverine input to the seabed regionally. This initial evaluation of model performance encourages further examination of sedimentation conditions in the Skeena Estuary, including those of importance to eelgrass beds and major port development areas. | |||
}} | |||
{{blank line template}} | {{blank line template}} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:24, 5 April 2019
Log in (or create account for non-CSDMS members)
Forgot username? Search or email:CSDMSweb@colorado.edu
Browse abstracts
Patterns and Rates of Sedimentation in a Bedrock Confined Estuary: The Skeena River Estuary and Marine Approaches
This study investigates riverine sediment dispersal within a bedrock confined estuary in British Columbia, Canada using the HydroTrend and Sedflux models. The models are evaluated using multibeam and acoustic backscatter surveys, piston cores, and grab samples across the Skeena Estuary and its contiguous marine areas. The data has been compiled to produce an overview of seabed geomorphology, texture, and sedimentation rates in the estuary and marine approaches. The model HydroTrend was used to estimate incoming sediment load from the Skeena River. Model estimates of suspended sediment load are higher than past estimates due to a large contribution of suspended sediment from a portion of the Skeena watershed previously excluded due to a lack of available hydrographic data. Over thirty kilometres from the river mouth, cores recovered mud sequences in the deeper proximal bedrock confined channels that indicated sedimentation rates of up to 2.83 cm yr-1. These deeper estuarine passages are seaward of the sandy deposits that make up the delta platform. In comparison, sedimentation rates in the further offshore marine approaches to the Skeena Estuary are as low as 0.004 cm/yr. Sedimentation rates within the estuary agree with the SedFlux model outputs using the HydroTrend sediment load results. More specifically, a sedimentation rate of 2.9 cm/yr was predicted using the SedFlux model at the same distance from the river mouth as the mud sequence radiocarbon dated cores. A relatively high sedimentation rate and seaward fining trend in grain size are interpreted as indicators of high riverine input to the seabed regionally. This initial evaluation of model performance encourages further examination of sedimentation conditions in the Skeena Estuary, including those of importance to eelgrass beds and major port development areas.
