Property:Describe available calibration data

From CSDMS

This is a property of type Text.

Showing 20 pages using this property.
C
The model has been benchmarked against analytical solutions for simple cases, such as fluvial slope-area scaling and parabolic to parabolic-planar hillslope form under uniform erosion, materials, and climate. Testing and calibration of some of the individual components (e.g., linear and nonlinear soil creep, stream-power fluvial erosion law, etc.) have been reported in the literature (for a review, see Tucker and Hancock, 2010). Testing of the full coupled model using natural experiments (Tucker, 2009) is ongoing.  +
M
The model has been compared qualitatively with Clarke and Werner (2004), Gallagher et al 1998, 2003 and 2005 and various Hay papers.  +
O
The model is tested against the known analytical solution (see Adams et al., 2017 for more details). It is unit-tested against this analytical solution every time Landlab is updated.  +
S
The model is tested against three known analytical solutions (see Shobe et al., 2017 for details).  +
M
The model is validated against a set of laboratory experiments that have been performed in a unidirectional flume.  +
C
The model produces virtual core-logs which can be compared with Ocean Drilling Program and other descriptive core logs and with outcrops.  +
E
The model was zeroed on the pre-1930 Minnesota River between Mankato and Jordan, Minnesota, using data available in the literature and on the USGS website.  +
G
The test is available in the main function of the code  +
The user guide covers essential features of gospl, mostly in the form of interactive Jupyter notebooks and Python scripts. https://gospl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_guide/index.html  +
D
Theoretical tests, Volga case study, Kura case study, (see references)  +
G
There are few test on Rio Corda, a ten square kilometer catchment in Trentino, Italy. Simulations on Little Washita will be made available soon, too.  +
R
There are several idealized and realistic test cases. Some of the idealized test cases have quasi-analytical solutions.  +
C
There are several idealized and realistic test cases. Some of the idealized test cases have quasi-analytical solutions.  +
U
There are several idealized and realistic test cases. Some of the idealized test cases have quasi-analytical solutions.  +
C
There are several idealized and realistic test cases. Some of the idealized test cases have quasi-analytical solutions.  +
T
This is not a model with adjustable parameters so calibration is not required. Example datasets are available  +
S
This model is not calibrated, but uses physically-based (measurable) parameters and measured data for validation. See next box.  +
T
This model/component is typically not calibrated to fit data, but is run with a best guess or measured value for each input parameter.  +
This model/component is typically not calibrated to fit data, but is run with a best guess or measured value for each input parameter.  +
This model/component is typically not calibrated to fit data, but is run with a best guess or measured value for each input parameter.  +