Reference:Reference-003706: Difference between revisions
From CSDMS
Bot: Automated import of articles *** existing text overwritten *** |
m Text replacement - "|MS_PublicationClusterID=2285042355" to "|MS_PublicationClusterID=2285042355 |Semantic_ID=a444b79055b3f2d62e0ea74ee3379281d7359a46
" |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|FeatureRef=No | |FeatureRef=No | ||
|PublicationClusterID=0 | |PublicationClusterID=0 | ||
|MS_PublicationClusterID=2285042355 | |MS_PublicationClusterID=2285042355 |Semantic_ID=a444b79055b3f2d62e0ea74ee3379281d7359a46 | ||
|PublicationWhatKindOf=a module application description | |PublicationWhatKindOf=a module application description | ||
|PublicationNrofModels=a single module | |PublicationNrofModels=a single module | ||
Revision as of 12:48, 9 January 2022
| Author(s) | Tang, Jianping; Niu, Xiaorui; Wang, Shuyu; Gao, Hongxia; Wang, Xueyuan; Wu, Jian; |
| BibType | journalArticle |
| Title | Statistical downscaling and dynamical downscaling of regional climate in China: Present climate evaluations and future climate projections: COMPARISON OF TWO DOWNSCALING METHODS |
| Editors | |
| Year | 2016-03-16 |
| Journal | Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres |
| Booktitle | |
| Volume | 121 |
| Pages | 2110–2129 |
| URL | http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/2015JD023977 |
| DOI | 10.1002/2015JD023977 |
| ISBN | |
| Note | Auto downloaded ref at: 2020-06-19
|
| |
|
| Feature reference | No |
| PublicationClusterID | 0 |
| MS_PublicationClusterID | 2285042355 |
| Semantic_ID | a444b79055b3f2d62e0ea74ee3379281d7359a46 |
| Nr of citations | 150 |
| Sort of publication | a module application description |
| Sort of model publication | a single module |
| Is the CSDMS HPC used | No |
| If HPC is used, for what project was it?: | |
| Associated simulation movie if any: |
|
| Model(s) discussed: | WRF |
