User:Brardino: Difference between revisions
From CSDMS
m Text replace - "AAAKKK" to "<!-- -->" |
No edit summary |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Signup information member | {{Signup information member | ||
|First name member=Francesco | |First name member=Francesco | ||
|Last name member=Brardinoni | |Last name member=Brardinoni | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Country member=Italy | |Country member=Italy | ||
|Confirm email member=francesco.brardinoni@unimib.it | |Confirm email member=francesco.brardinoni@unimib.it | ||
|Working group member=Terrestrial Working Group | |Working group member=Terrestrial Working Group | ||
|Emaillist group member=yes | |||
|Description of your CSDMS-related interests member=So far I have taken an empirical (field-based) approach to geomorphology. This approach has clear spatial and temporal limitations. I'd hope to see field data (perhaps coming from different regions) contributing to the development/fine tuning of landscape evolution/sediment flux models to examine how site-specific data will scale up at regional spatial scales and possibly at longer (> 100 yrs)time scales. | |Description of your CSDMS-related interests member=So far I have taken an empirical (field-based) approach to geomorphology. This approach has clear spatial and temporal limitations. I'd hope to see field data (perhaps coming from different regions) contributing to the development/fine tuning of landscape evolution/sediment flux models to examine how site-specific data will scale up at regional spatial scales and possibly at longer (> 100 yrs)time scales. | ||
|How did you learn about CSDMS member=through geomorph-list announcement | |How did you learn about CSDMS member=through geomorph-list announcement | ||
}} | }} | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> | ||
Latest revision as of 10:20, 16 October 2019
Francesco Brardinoni, website username login: Brardino
|
|
||||||||
Member of the following CSDMS groups
- Terrestrial Working Group
Signed up for the mailing list: yes
So far I have taken an empirical (field-based) approach to geomorphology. This approach has clear spatial and temporal limitations. I'd hope to see field data (perhaps coming from different regions) contributing to the development/fine tuning of landscape evolution/sediment flux models to examine how site-specific data will scale up at regional spatial scales and possibly at longer (> 100 yrs)time scales.
