2024 CSDMS meeting-067: Difference between revisions

From CSDMS
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract yes no 2024
{{CSDMS meeting abstract yes no 2024
|CSDMS meeting abstract submit 2024=No
|CSDMS meeting abstract submit 2024=Yes
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract poster Epub 2024
|CSDMS meeting poster Epub submit 2024=Poster
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title temp2024
|CSDMS meeting abstract title=Modeling the coupled evolution of barrier landscapes and communities
|Working_group_member_WG_FRG=Coastal Working Group, Human Dimensions Focus Research Group
}}
{{CSDMS meeting authors template
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Laura
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Moore
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Chapel Hill
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=United States
|State=North Carolina
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=laura.moore@unc.edu
}}
{{CSDMS meeting authors template
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Benton
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Franklin
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Chapel Hill
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=United States
|State=North Carolina
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=wbenton@email.unc.edu
}}
{{CSDMS meeting authors template
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=ian
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Reeves
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Falmouth
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=United States
|State=Massachusetts
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=ian.reeves@whoi.edu
}}
{{CSDMS meeting authors template
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Katherine
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Anarde
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=North Carolina State University
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Raleigh
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=United States
|State=North Carolina
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=kanarde@ncsu.edu
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template 2024
|CSDMS meeting abstract=On low-lying coastlines, sand (and/or gravel) washed landward of a beach during storms creates barrier landscapes. This ‘overwashed’ sand also tends to maintain barrier elevation in the face of rising sea level, and barrier width in the face of an eroding shoreline. However, from the point of view of coastal communities, the storm processes that deposit the sand, as well as the sand itself, presents hazards that need to be mitigated, or even disasters that need to be recovered from. The strategies typically chosen to mitigate storm hazards and recover from storm impacts typically involve attempts to prevent overwash processes (e.g. by building and maintaining large dunes) or to undo the effects of overwash processes (e.g. bulldozing overwashed sand off roads and using it to rebuild dunes). Although these mitigation and recovery strategies seem necessary in the short term, they can reduce coastal resiliency in the long term, by tending to make a barrier lower (relative to rising sea level) and narrower (in the case of an eroding shoreline). A lower and narrower barrier is more vulnerable to sunny day flooding and severe storm impacts.
 
The newly developed CoAStal Community-lAnDscape Evolution (CASCADE) model couples physical processes (storm erosion and sediment redistribution, dune growth, sea-level rise, shoreface and shoreline change, and gradients in alongshore sediment flux) and the effects of management strategies (e.g. overwash removal and dune maintenance, highway relocation, and beach nourishment). Using this model, we examine the outcomes, over decades, of the coupling between natural dynamics and commonly employed management strategies. Modeled outcomes depend on sea-level-rise rate, storm sequences, and initial barrier topography, and they range from developed barrier systems that can be sustained for over a century before becoming uninhabitable (effectively drowned), to scenarios in which highways and/or communities need to be abandoned within decades. Subsequent barrier recovery depends on the final state of the developed system before abandonment, as well as stochasticity in the timing of storms. When different management strategies are employed at different locations alongshore, their effects are coupled via the redistribution of sediment along a curved coastline.
 
We are also using CASCADE in a participatory modeling collaboration involving managers and planners with the Cape Hatteras National Seashore and the North Carolina Department of Transportation, as well as community representatives. Together, we will examine the range of outcomes, under different climate scenarios, of the strategies being considered for managing a critically threatened transportation corridor along a barrier within the National Seashore.
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract poster Epub 2024}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title temp2024}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template 2024}}
{{blank line template}}
{{blank line template}}

Revision as of 11:19, 2 April 2024



(if you haven't already)



"NC" is not in the list (NO STATE, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, D.C., Delaware, ...) of allowed values for the "CSDMS meeting state" property.
Log in (or create account for non-CSDMS members)
Forgot username? Search or email:CSDMSweb@colorado.edu


Browse  abstracts


Modeling the coupled evolution of barrier landscapes and communities


Brad Murray, (he/him),Duke Univ. Durham , United States. abmurray@duke.edu
Laura Moore, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina, United States. laura.moore@unc.edu
Benton Franklin, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina, United States. wbenton@email.unc.edu
ian Reeves, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Falmouth Massachusetts, United States. ian.reeves@whoi.edu
Katherine Anarde, North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina, United States. kanarde@ncsu.edu



On low-lying coastlines, sand (and/or gravel) washed landward of a beach during storms creates barrier landscapes. This ‘overwashed’ sand also tends to maintain barrier elevation in the face of rising sea level, and barrier width in the face of an eroding shoreline. However, from the point of view of coastal communities, the storm processes that deposit the sand, as well as the sand itself, presents hazards that need to be mitigated, or even disasters that need to be recovered from. The strategies typically chosen to mitigate storm hazards and recover from storm impacts typically involve attempts to prevent overwash processes (e.g. by building and maintaining large dunes) or to undo the effects of overwash processes (e.g. bulldozing overwashed sand off roads and using it to rebuild dunes). Although these mitigation and recovery strategies seem necessary in the short term, they can reduce coastal resiliency in the long term, by tending to make a barrier lower (relative to rising sea level) and narrower (in the case of an eroding shoreline). A lower and narrower barrier is more vulnerable to sunny day flooding and severe storm impacts.

The newly developed CoAStal Community-lAnDscape Evolution (CASCADE) model couples physical processes (storm erosion and sediment redistribution, dune growth, sea-level rise, shoreface and shoreline change, and gradients in alongshore sediment flux) and the effects of management strategies (e.g. overwash removal and dune maintenance, highway relocation, and beach nourishment). Using this model, we examine the outcomes, over decades, of the coupling between natural dynamics and commonly employed management strategies. Modeled outcomes depend on sea-level-rise rate, storm sequences, and initial barrier topography, and they range from developed barrier systems that can be sustained for over a century before becoming uninhabitable (effectively drowned), to scenarios in which highways and/or communities need to be abandoned within decades. Subsequent barrier recovery depends on the final state of the developed system before abandonment, as well as stochasticity in the timing of storms. When different management strategies are employed at different locations alongshore, their effects are coupled via the redistribution of sediment along a curved coastline.

We are also using CASCADE in a participatory modeling collaboration involving managers and planners with the Cape Hatteras National Seashore and the North Carolina Department of Transportation, as well as community representatives. Together, we will examine the range of outcomes, under different climate scenarios, of the strategies being considered for managing a critically threatened transportation corridor along a barrier within the National Seashore.