Meeting:Abstract 2013 CSDMS meeting-060

From CSDMS
Revision as of 15:09, 31 January 2013 by QIANZHANG (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{CSDMS meeting 2013 not paid}} {{CSDMS meeting personal information template-2013 |CSDMS meeting first name=Qian |CSDMS meeting last name=Zhang |CSDMS meeting institute=JOHNS...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Continue registration:
(If you haven't done already)
Refresh page

Browse  abstracts

CSDMS all hands meeting 2013

Long-term Seasonal Trends of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment Load from the Non-tidal Susquehanna River Basin to Chesapeake Bay

Qian Zhang, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland, United States. qzhang19@jhu.edu
Damian Brady, University of Maine Walpole Maine, United States. damian.brady@maine.edu
William Ball, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland, United States. bball@jhu.edu


[[Image:|300px|right|link=File:]]Reduction of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and suspended sediment (SS) load has been a principal focus of Chesapeake Bay Watershed management for decades. To evaluate the progress of management actions in the Bay’s largest tributary, the Susquehanna River, we analyzed the long-term seasonal trends of flow-normalized N, P, and SS load over the last two to three decades, both above and below the Conowingo Reservoir. Our results indicate that annual and decadal-scale trends of nutrient and sediment load generally followed similar patterns in all four seasons, implying that changes in watershed function and land use had similar impacts on nutrient and sediment load at all times of the year. Above the Conowingo Reservoir, the combined loads from the Marietta and Conestoga stations indicate general trends of N, P, and SS reduction in the Susquehanna River Basin, which can most likely be attributed to a suite of management actions on point, agricultural, and stormwater sources. In contrast, upward trends of SS and particulate-associated P and N were generally observed below the Conowingo Reservoir since the mid-1990s. Our analyses suggest that (1) the reservoir’s capacity to trap these materials has been diminishing over the past two to three decades, and especially so for P since the mid-1990s, and that (2) the reservoir has already neared its sediment storage capacity. These changes in reservoir performance will pose significant new kinds of challenges to attainment of total maximum daily load goals for the Susquehanna River Basin, and particularly if also accompanied by increases in storm frequency and intensity due to climate change. Accordingly, the reservoir issue may need to be factored into the proper establishment of regulatory load requirements and the development of watershed implementation plans.


[[Image:|300px|right]]