<div id=text-logo>This_text_is_a_transpar ent placeholder to make click logo</div>
Community
Join
Groups
Publications
Jobs
Events
Forum
Models
Model Repository
Contribute a Model
Version Control
Reproducible science
Education
ESPIn
Roadshows
Webinars
Labs
Ivy
Movies
Lectures
Textbooks
Science on a Sphere
Images
Contribute
Products
CSDMS Workbench
OpenEarthscape
Data Products
CSDMS @ GitHub
Services
Proposal Support
Visiting Scientists
Sponsorships
Supercomputing
JupyterHub
Software Engineering
Help Desk
Office Hours
Web API
About
What is CSDMS?
Between the Bytes
Awards
Governance
Diversity & Inclusion
Code of Conduct
Partners
Related Programs
Metrics
Citing CSDMS
Contact Us
Log in
Request account
Edit Presenters: Presenters-0108
From CSDMS
Jump to:
navigation
,
search
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
You need to
LOG IN!
The action you have requested is limited to users in the group:
Users
.
Presenters abstracts and presentations
Event & Personal info
Event title
*
CSDMS 2018 annual meeting - Geoprocesses, geohazards
CTSP: Coupling of Tectonic and Surface Processes
CSDMS 2017 annual meeting: Modeling Coupled Earth and Human Systems - The Dynamic Duo
Linking Earth System Dynamics and Social System Modeling
Joint CSDMS-SEN annual meeting 2016: Capturing Climate Change
CSDMS 2015 annual Meeting - Models meet data, data meet models
CSDMS 2014 annual meeting - Uncertainty and Sensitivity in Surface Dynamics Modeling
CSDMS 2.0: Moving Forward
CSDMS 2011 annual meeting - Impact of time and process scales
AGU Chapman Conference on Source to Sink Systems Around the World and Through Time
CSDMS 2010 annual meeting - Modeling for Environmental Change
2009 Joint workshop for CSDMS Education & Knowledge Transfer WG, Cyberinformatics WG, and Hydrology FRG
2009 Chesapeake FRG - Yorktown
2009 Joint workshop for CSDMS Terrestrial and Coastal WG
2009 Joint workshop for CSDMS Marine Working Group and Carbonate FRG
Modeling of turbidity currents and related gravity currents
2009 Chesapeake FRG meeting - Annapolis
2009 Cyberinformatics and Numerics WG Meeting
2009 Joined meeting for CSDMS Coastal and Marine WG
CSDMS 2009Terrestrial WG meeting
CSDMS 2009 Carbonate FRG meeting
CSDMS 2009 Hydrology FRG meeting
CSDMS 2008 Education and Knowledge Transfer (EKT) WG Meeting
Third SEDIBUD Workshop
Community Sedimentary Model for Carbonate Systems
CSDMS 2008 Cyberinformatics and Numerics WG Meeting
Dynamics and Vulnerability of River Delta Systems
Mechanisms of Sediment Retention in Estuaries
CSDMS Implementation Plan Workshop
2003 NSF Workshop
CSDMS Planning Workshop
CSDMS 2018 Webinars
Flood Risk Workshop 2018
CSDMS3.0 - Bridging Boundaries
CSDMS 2019 Webinars
CSDMS 2020: Linking Ecosphere and Geosphere
CSDMS 2019 interagency meeting
CSDMS 2020 Webinars
CSDMS 2021: Changing Landscapes and Seascapes: Modeling for Discovery, Decision Making, and Communication
CSDMS 2021 Webinars
CSDMS 2022: Environmental Extremes and Earthscape Evolution
CSDMS 2022 Webinars
CSDMS 2023: Patterns and Processes Across Scales
CSDMS 2023 Webinars
CSDMS 2024 Webinars
CSDMS 2024: Coastlines, Critical Zones and Cascading Hazards: Modeling Dynamic Interfaces from Deep Time to Human Time
CSDMS 2025: Exploring Earth's Surface with Models, Data & AI
CSDMS 2025 Webinars
Event year
*
2015
Presentation type
*
Clinic
Invited oral presentation
Webinar
Date webinar:
Time should be entered in 24-hour format.
Registration link:
First name:
*
Mary
Last name:
*
Hill
Organization:
*
University of Kansas
Country:
*
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas, The
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burma
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Cong, Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Federated
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia, The
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea-Bissau
Guinea
Guyana
Haiti
Holy See
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, North
Korea, South
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States of
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Vietnam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
European union
Other country...
State:
*
NO STATE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
D.C.
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Email address:
*
hary mchill@ku.edu
Title presentation:
*
Testing model analysis frameworks
Co-Authors
First name:
*
Last name:
*
Institute / Organization:
*
Country:
*
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas, The
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burma
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Cong, Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Federated
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia, The
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea-Bissau
Guinea
Guyana
Haiti
Holy See
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, North
Korea, South
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States of
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Vietnam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
State:
NO STATE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
District of Columbia
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Email address:
*
Add co-author
Abstract
Abstract:
*
Model analysis frameworks specify ideas by which models and data are combined to simulate a system on interest. A given modeling framework will provide methods for model parameterization, data and model error characterization, sensitivity analysis (including identifying observations and parameters important to calibration and prediction), uncertainty quantification, and so on. Some model analysis frameworks suggest a narrow range of methods, while other frameworks try to place a broader range of methods in context. Testing is required to understand how well a model analysis framework is likely to work in practice. Commonly models are constructed to produce predictions, and here the accuracy and precision of predictions are considered.<br><br>The design of meaningful tests depends in part on the timing of system dynamics. In some circumstances the predicted quantity is readily measured and changes quickly, such as for weather (temperature, wind and precipitation), floods, and hurricanes. In such cases meaningful tests involve comparing predictions and measured values and tests can be conducted daily, hourly or even more frequently. The benchmarking tests in rainfall-runoff modeling, such as HEPEX, are in this category. The theoretical rating curves of Kean and Smith provide promise for high flow predictions. Though often challenged by measurement difficulties, short timeframe systems provide the simplest circumstance for conducting meaningful tests of model analysis frameworks.<br><br>If measurements are not readily available and(or) the system responds to changes over decades or centuries, as generally occurs for climate change, saltwater intrusion of groundwater systems, and dewatering of aquifers, prediction accuracy needs to be evaluated in other ways. For example, in recent work two methods were used to identify the likely accuracy of different methods used to construct models of groundwater systems (including parameterization methods): (1) results of complex and simple models were compared and (2) cross-validation experiments. These and other tests can require massive computational resources for any but the simplest of problems. In this talk we discuss the importance of model framework testing in these longer-term circumstances and provide examples of tests from several recent publications. We further suggest that for these long-term systems, the design and performance of such tests are essential for the responsible development of model frameworks, are critical for models of these environmental systems to provide enduring insights, and are one of the most important uses of high performance computing in natural resource evaluation.
Keywords
Keywords:
*
Sensitivity analysis
Keywords:
*
Model framework testing
Keywords:
*
Add keywords
Presentation material
*
Select key audience groups of interest:
*
Terrestrial Working Group
Coastal Working Group
Marine Working Group
Education and Knowledge Transfer (EKT) Working Group
Cyberinformatics and Numerics Working Group
Hydrology Focus Research Group
Chesapeake Focus Research Group
Critical Zone Focus Research Group
Human Dimensions Focus Research Group
Geodynamics Focus Research Group
Ecosystem Dynamics Focus Research Group
Coastal Vulnerability Initiative
Continental Margin Initiative
Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning Initiative
Modeling Platform Interoperability Initiative
River Network Modeling Initiative
Submit presentation, preferable as PDF:
Upload file
Upload supporting material as zip:
Upload file
Upload additional supporting material as zip:
Upload file
*
Required fields
Save presentation
Cancel
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Cargo data