Difference between revisions of "Model:HSPF"

From CSDMS
Line 156: Line 156:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Documentation model
 
{{Documentation model
|Provide key papers on model if any=1.  Bicknell, B.R., J. C. Imhoff, J. L. Kittle, A. S. Donigian, and R.C.
+
|Provide key papers on model if any=Key Papers:
Johanson. 1993. Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF): Users
+
*'''Barnwell, T. O., and R. Johanson. 1981. HSPF: A Comprehensive Package for Simulation of Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality. In: Nonpoint Pollution Control: Tools and Techniques for the Future. Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, Rockville, MD.'''
Manual for Release 10. EPA-600/R-93/174, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.
 
  
2.  Donigian, A. S., J. C. Imhoff , B. R. Bicknell, and J. L. Kittle. 1984.
+
*'''Barnwell, T. O., and J. L. Kittle. 1984. Hydrologic Simulation Program - FORTRAN: Development, Maintenance and Applications. In: Proceedings Third International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage. Chalmers Institute of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden.'''
Application Guide for the Hydrologic Simulation Program - FORTRAN.
 
EPA 600/3-84-066, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.
 
  
3. Barnwell, T. O., and R. Johanson. 1981. HSPF: A Comprehensive Package
+
*'''Bicknell, B.R., J. C. Imhoff, J. L. Kittle, A. S. Donigian, and R.C.  Johanson. 1993. Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF): Users Manual for Release 10. EPA-600/R-93/174, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.'''
for Simulation of Watershed Hydrology and Water Quality. In:  Nonpoint
 
Pollution Control: Tools and Techniques for the Future. Interstate
 
Commission on the Potomac River Basin, Rockville, MD.
 
  
4. Barnwell, T. O., and J. L. Kittle. 1984. Hydrologic Simulation Program
+
*'''Donigian, A. S., J. C. Imhoff , B. R. Bicknell, and J. L. Kittle. 1984. Application Guide for the Hydrologic Simulation Program - FORTRAN. EPA 600/3-84-066, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.'''
- FORTRAN: Development, Maintenance and Applications. In:  Proceedings Third
 
International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage. Chalmers Institute of
 
Technology, Goteborg, Sweden.
 
  
5.  Lorber, M. N., and L. A. Mulkey. 1982. An Evaluation of Three Pesticide
+
*'''Lorber, M. N., and L. A. Mulkey. 1982. An Evaluation of Three Pesticide Runoff Loading Models. J. Environ. Qual., 11:519-529.'''
Runoff Loading Models. J. Environ. Qual., 11:519-529.
 
  
6. Mulkey, L. A., R. B. Ambrose, and T. O. Barnwell. 1986. Aquatic Fate
+
Other Papers:
and Transport Modeling Techniques for Predicting Environmental Exposure to
+
* Bicknell, B. R., A. S. Donigian and T. O. Barnwell. 1984. Modeling Water Quality and the Effects of Best Management Practices in the Iowa River Basin. J. Water Sci. Technol., 17:1141-1153.  
Organic Pesticides and Other Toxicants -- A Comparative Study. In: Urban
 
Runoff Pollution.  Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
 
  
7. Schnoor, J. L., C. Sato, D. McKetchnie, and D. Sahoo. 1987. Processes,
+
* Chew, Y.C., L.W. Moore, and R.H. Smith. 1991. Hydrologic Simulation of Tennessee's North Reelfoot Creek Watershed. J. Water Poll. Control Federation., 63:10-16.  
Coefficients, and Models for Simulating Toxic Organics and Heavy Metals in
 
Surface Waters. EPA/600/3-87/015, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.
 
  
8. Donigian, A. S., J. C. Imhoff, and B. R. Bicknell. 1983. Modeling Water
+
* Donigian, A. S., J. C. Imhoff, and B. R. Bicknell. 1983. Modeling Water Quality and the Effects of Best Management Practices in Four Mile Creek, Iowa. EPA/600/3-81-044, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.  
Quality and the Effects of Best Management Practices in Four Mile Creek,
 
Iowa. EPA/600/3-81-044, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.
 
  
9. Bicknell, B. R., A. S. Donigian and T. O. Barnwell. 1984. Modeling
+
* Donigian, A. S., D. W. Meier and P. P. Jowise. 1986. Stream Transport and Agricultural Runoff for Exposure Assessment: A Methodology. EPA/600/3-86-011, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.  
Water Quality and the Effects of Best Management Practices in the Iowa River
 
Basin. J. Water Sci. Technol., 17:1141-1153.
 
  
10. Donigian, A. S., D. W. Meier and P. P. Jowise. 1986. Stream Transport
+
*  Hicks, C.N., W.C. Huber, and J.P. Heaney. 1985. Simulation of Possible Effects of Deep Pumping on Surface Hydrology Using HSPF. In: T.O. Barnwell, Jr. (ed.) Proceedings of Stormwater and Water Quality Model User Group Meeting. EPA-600/9-85/016, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.  
and Agricultural Runoff for Exposure Assessment: A Methodology.
 
EPA/600/3-86-011, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.
 
  
11. Moore, L.W., H. Matheny, T. Tyree, D. Sabatini and S.J. Klaine. 1988.
+
* Lorber, M. N., and L. A. Mulkey. 1982. An Evaluation of Three Pesticide Runoff Loading Models. J. Environ. Qual., 11:519-529.  
Agricultural Runoff Modeling in a Small West Tennessee Watershed. J. Water
 
Poll. Control Federation., 60:242-249.
 
  
12. Chew, Y.C., L.W. Moore, and R.H. Smith. 1991. Hydrologic Simulation of
+
*  Moore, L.W., H. Matheny, T. Tyree, D. Sabatini and S.J. Klaine. 1988. Agricultural Runoff Modeling in a Small West Tennessee Watershed. J. Water Poll. Control Federation., 60:242-249.  
Tennessee's North Reelfoot Creek Watershed. J. Water Poll. Control
 
Federation., 63:10-16.
 
  
13. Hicks, C.N., W.C. Huber, and J.P. Heaney. 1985. Simulation of Possible
+
*  Motta, D.J. and M.S. Cheng. 1987. The Henson Creek Watershed Study. In: H.C. Torno (ed.) Proceedings of Stormwater and Water Quality Users Group Meeting. Charles Howard and Assoc., Victoria, BC, Canada.
Effects of Deep Pumping on Surface Hydrology Using HSPF. In: T.O. Barnwell,
+
 
Jr. (ed.) Proceedings of Stormwater and Water Quality Model User Group
+
* Mulkey, L. A., R. B. Ambrose, and T. O. Barnwell. 1986. Aquatic Fate and Transport Modeling Techniques for Predicting Environmental Exposure to Organic Pesticides and Other Toxicants -- A Comparative Study. In: Urban Runoff Pollution. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.  
Meeting.  EPA-600/9-85/016, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.
+
 
 +
* Schnoor, J. L., C. Sato, D. McKetchnie, and D. Sahoo. 1987. Processes, Coefficients, and Models for Simulating Toxic Organics and Heavy Metals in Surface Waters. EPA/600/3-87/015, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.  
  
14. Motta, D.J. and M.S. Cheng. 1987.  The Henson Creek Watershed Study.  In:
 
H.C. Torno (ed.) Proceedings of Stormwater and Water Quality Users Group
 
Meeting.  Charles Howard and Assoc., Victoria, BC, Canada.
 
 
|Manual model available=Yes
 
|Manual model available=Yes
 
|Model website if any=http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/ The HSPF User's Manual is available as a WordPerfect (version 5.1) document in (binary, non-ASCII) files HSPF_V11.001, HSPF_V11.002, HSPF_V11.003,
 
|Model website if any=http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/ The HSPF User's Manual is available as a WordPerfect (version 5.1) document in (binary, non-ASCII) files HSPF_V11.001, HSPF_V11.002, HSPF_V11.003,

Revision as of 10:53, 30 March 2011


Contact

First name Bob
Last name Bicknell
Type of contact Technical contact
Institute / Organization EPA
Postal address 1 Center for Exposure Assessment Modeling (CEAM)
Postal address 2 960 College Station Road
Town / City Athens
Postal code 30605-2700
State Georgia
Country USA"USA" is not in the list (Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, ...) of allowed values for the "Country" property.
Email address test@test.com
Phone 706-355-8403
Fax 706-355-8302




HSPF


Metadata

Summary

Also known as
Model type Modular
Model part of larger framework

biogeochemistry, water quality,

Technical specs

Supported platforms Windows
Other platform
Programming language Fortran77
Other program language
Code optimized Single Processor
Multiple processors implemented
Nr of distributed processors
Nr of shared processors
Start year development 1997
Does model development still take place? Yes
If above answer is no, provide end year model development
Code development status
When did you indicate the 'code development status'?
Model availability As code
Source code availability
(Or provide future intension)
Through web repository
Source web address http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/
Source csdms web address
Program license type Other
Program license type other --
Memory requirements This model system is designed for the IBM PC family of microcomputer or compatible systems running under version 3.30 or higher of the Microsoft or PC Disk Operating Systems (PC or MS DOS--refer to DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM section). Properly configured, this model system and its support files and programs can be executed under PC DOS or MS DOS 3.30 and later versions, DOS 4.0x, DOS 5.0x, or DOS 6.x.
Typical run time --


In/Output

Describe input parameters Data needs for HSPF can be extensive. HSPF is a continuous simulation

program and requires continuous data to drive the simulations. At a minimum, continuous rainfall records are required to drive the runoff model and additional records of evapotranspiration, temperature, and solar intensity are desirable. A large number of model parameters can be specified although default values are provided where reasonable values are available. HSPF is a general-purpose program and special attention has been paid to cases where input parameters are omitted. In addition, option flags allow bypassing of whole sections of the program where data are not available.

Input format ASCII
Other input format
Describe output parameters HSPF produces a time history of the runoff flow rate, sediment load, and

nutrient and pesticide concentrations, along with a time history of water quantity and quality at any point in a watershed. Simulation results can be processed through a frequency and duration analysis routine that produces output compatible with conventional toxicological measures (e.g., 96-hour LC50).

Output format ASCII
Other output format
Pre-processing software needed? No
Describe pre-processing software
Post-processing software needed? No
Describe post-processing software
Visualization software needed? No
If above answer is yes
Other visualization software


Process

Describe processes represented by the model HSPF assumes that the "Stanford Watershed Model" hydrologic model is

appropriate for the area being modeled. Further, the instream model assumes the receiving water body is well-mixed with width and depth and is thus limited to well-mixed rivers and reservoirs. Application of this methodology generally requires a team effort because of its comprehensive nature.

Describe key physical parameters and equations
Describe length scale and resolution constraints
Describe time scale and resolution constraints
Describe any numerical limitations and issues


Testing

Describe available calibration data sets SPF and the earlier models from which it was developed have been extensively

applied in a wide variety of hydrologic and water quality studies (3,4), including pesticide runoff model testing (5), aquatic fate and transport model testing (6,7), and analyses of agricultural best management practices (8,9). An application of HSPF in a screening methodology for pesticide review is described by Donigian et al. (10). In addition, HSPF has been validated with both field data and model experiments, and has been reviewed by independent experts (11-20).

The Stream Transport and Agricultural Runoff for Exposure Assessment Methodology (STREAM) applies the HSPF program to various test watersheds for five major crops in four agricultural regions in the United States, defines a "representative" watershed based on regional conditions and an extrapolation of the calibration for the test watershed, and performs a sensitivity analysis on key pesticide parameters to generate cumulative frequency distributions of pesticide loads and concentrations in each regions. The resulting methodology requires the user to evaluate only the crops and regions of interest, the pesticide application rate, and three pesticide parameters -- the partition coefficient, the soil/sediment decay rate, and the solution decay rate.

The EPA Chesapeake Bay Program has been using the HSPF model as the framework for modeling total watershed contributions of flow, sediment, and nutrients (and associated constituents such as water temperature, DO, BOD, etc.) to the tidal region of the Chesapeake Bay (21,22). The watershed modeling represents pollutant contributions from an area of more than 68,000 sq. mi., and provides the input to drive a fully dynamic three-dimensional, hydrodynamic/water quality model of the Bay. The watershed drainage area is divided into land segments and stream channel segments. The land areas modeled include forest, agricultural cropland (conventional and conservation tillage systems), pasture, urban (pervious and impervious areas), and uncontrolled animal waste contributions. The stream channel simulation includes flow routing and oxygen and nutrient biochemical modeling (through phytoplankton) in order to account for instream processes affecting nutrient delivery to the Bay.

Currently, buildup/washoff type algorithms are being used for urban impervious areas, potency factors for all pervious areas, and constant (or seasonally variable) concentrations for all subsurface contributions and animal waste components. Enhancements are underway to utilize the detailed process (i.e. Agrichemical modules) simulation for cropland areas to better represent the impacts of agricultural BMPs and to include nitrogen cycling in forested systems to evaluate the impacts of atmospheric deposition of nitrogen on Chesapeake Bay. The watershed modeling is being used to evaluate nutrient management alternatives for attaining a 40% reduction in nutrient loads delivered to the Bay, as defined in a joint agreement among the governors of the member states.

Upload calibration data sets if available:
Describe available test data sets
Upload test data sets if available:
Describe ideal data for testing


Other

Do you have current or future plans for collaborating with other researchers? http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/
Is there a manual available? Yes
Upload manual if available:
Model website if any http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/ The HSPF User's Manual is available as a WordPerfect (version 5.1) document in (binary, non-ASCII) files HSPF_V11.001, HSPF_V11.002, HSPF_V11.003,

HSPF_V11.004, HSPF_V11.005, HSPF_V11.006, and HSPF_V11.007 in the DOCUMENT sub-directory. Refer to file READ.ME in the README sub-directory for further information on the storage format and printing requirements of the user's manual files.

Model forum / discussion board
Comments



Introduction

History

Papers

Issues

Help

Input Files

Output Files

Download

Source