Difference between revisions of "Model:HSPF"

From CSDMS
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|State=Georgia
 
|State=Georgia
 
|Country=USA
 
|Country=USA
|Email address=http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/
+
|Email address=test@test.com
|Phone=706/355-8403
+
|Phone=706-355-8403
|Fax=706/355-8302
+
|Fax=706-355-8302
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Model identity
 
{{Model identity
Line 19: Line 19:
 
|Spatial dimensions=2D
 
|Spatial dimensions=2D
 
|Spatialscale=Landscape-Scale, Watershed-Scale
 
|Spatialscale=Landscape-Scale, Watershed-Scale
|One-line model description=a comprehensive package for simulation of watershed hydrology and water quality for both conventional
+
|One-line model description=a comprehensive package for simulation of watershed hydrology and water quality for both conventional and toxic organic pollutants
and toxic organic pollutants
 
 
|Extended model description=Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF) is a comprehensive package
 
|Extended model description=Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF) is a comprehensive package
 
for simulation of watershed hydrology and water quality for both conventional
 
for simulation of watershed hydrology and water quality for both conventional
Line 61: Line 60:
 
|Source web address=http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/
 
|Source web address=http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/
 
|Program license type=Other
 
|Program license type=Other
|OpenMI compliant=No not possible
+
|Program license type other=--
|CCA component=No not possible
+
|OpenMI compliant=No but possible
|IRF interface=No not possible
+
|CCA component=No but possible
 +
|IRF interface=No but possible
 
|Memory requirements=This model system is designed for the IBM PC family of microcomputer or compatible systems running under version 3.30 or higher of the Microsoft or PC Disk Operating Systems (PC or MS DOS--refer to DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM section).  Properly configured, this model system and its support files and programs can be executed under PC DOS or MS DOS 3.30 and later versions, DOS 4.0x, DOS 5.0x, or DOS 6.x.
 
|Memory requirements=This model system is designed for the IBM PC family of microcomputer or compatible systems running under version 3.30 or higher of the Microsoft or PC Disk Operating Systems (PC or MS DOS--refer to DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM section).  Properly configured, this model system and its support files and programs can be executed under PC DOS or MS DOS 3.30 and later versions, DOS 4.0x, DOS 5.0x, or DOS 6.x.
 +
|Typical run time=--
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Input - Output description
 
{{Input - Output description
Line 207: Line 208:
 
Meeting.  Charles Howard and Assoc., Victoria, BC, Canada.
 
Meeting.  Charles Howard and Assoc., Victoria, BC, Canada.
  
15. Nichols, J.C. and M.P. Timpe. 1985. Use of HSPF to simulate Dynamics of
 
Phosphorus in Floodplain Wetlands over a Wide Range of Hydrologic Regimes.
 
In:  T.O. Barnwell, Jr. (ed.) Proceedings of Stormwater and Water Quality
 
Model Users Group Meeting.  EPA-600/9-85/016,  U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605
 
 
16. Schueler, T.R. 1983. Seneca Creek Watershed Management Study, Final
 
Report, Volumes I and II. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments,
 
Washington, DC.
 
 
17. Song, J.A., G.F. Rawl, W.R. Howard. 1983. Lake Manatee Watershed Water
 
Resources Evaluation using Hydrologic Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF).  In:
 
P. Beron and T. Barnwell (eds.) Colloque sur la Modelisation des Eaux
 
Pluviales. GREMU 83/03 Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
 
 
18. Sullivan, M.P. and T.R. Schueler. 1982. The Piscataway Creek Watershed
 
Model: A Stormwater and Nonpoint Source Management Tool. In: Paul E. Wisner
 
(ed.) Proceedings Stormwater and Water Quality Management Modeling and SWMM
 
Users Group Meeting.  Univ. of Ottawa, Dept. Civil Engr., Ottawa, Ont.,
 
Canada.
 
 
19. Weatherbe, D.G. and Z. Novak. 1985. Development of Water Management
 
Strategy for the Humber River. In: E.M. James and W. James (eds.) Proceedings
 
Conference on Stormwater and Water Quality Management Modeling. Computational
 
Hydraulics Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada.
 
 
20. Udhiri, S., M-S Cheng, and R.L. Powell. 1985. The Impact of Snow Addition
 
on Watershed Analysis Using HSPF.  In:  T.O. Barnwell, Jr. (ed.) Proceedings
 
of Stormwater and Water Quality Model Users Group Meeting. EPA-600/9-85/016,
 
U.S. EPA, Athens, GA, 30605.
 
 
21. Donigian, A.S., B.R. Bicknell and J.L. Kittle.  1986. Conversion of the
 
Chesapeake Bay Basin Model to HSPF Operation. Prepared by AQUA TERRA
 
Consultants for Computer Sciences Corporation, Annapolis, MD, and U.S.EPA
 
Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MD.
 
 
22. Donigian, A.S.,  B.R. Bicknell, L.C. Linker, J. Hannawald, C. Chang, and
 
R. Reynolds. 1990. Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model Application to
 
Calculate Bay Nutrient Loadings: Preliminary Phase I Findings and
 
Recommendations. Prepared by AQUA TERRA Consultants for U.S. EPA Chesapeake
 
Bay Program, Annapolis, MD.
 
 
|Manual model available=Yes
 
|Manual model available=Yes
|Model website if any=http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/
+
|Model website if any=http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/ The HSPF User's Manual is available as a WordPerfect (version 5.1) document in (binary, non-ASCII) files HSPF_V11.001, HSPF_V11.002, HSPF_V11.003,
|Model forum=The HSPF User's Manual is available as a WordPerfect (version 5.1) document
 
in (binary, non-ASCII) files HSPF_V11.001, HSPF_V11.002, HSPF_V11.003,
 
 
HSPF_V11.004, HSPF_V11.005, HSPF_V11.006, and HSPF_V11.007 in the DOCUMENT
 
HSPF_V11.004, HSPF_V11.005, HSPF_V11.006, and HSPF_V11.007 in the DOCUMENT
 
sub-directory.  Refer to file READ.ME in the README sub-directory for further
 
sub-directory.  Refer to file READ.ME in the README sub-directory for further
Line 257: Line 216:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Additional comments model}}
 
{{Additional comments model}}
<!-- PLEASE USE THE &quot;EDIT WITH FORM&quot; BUTTON TO EDIT ABOVE CONTENTS; CONTINUE TO EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
+
<!-- PLEASE USE THE "EDIT WITH FORM" BUTTON TO EDIT ABOVE CONTENTS; CONTINUE TO EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
==Introduction==
 
==Introduction==
  

Revision as of 12:15, 21 October 2010


Contact

First name Bob
Last name Bicknell
Type of contact Technical contact
Institute / Organization EPA
Postal address 1 Center for Exposure Assessment Modeling (CEAM)
Postal address 2 960 College Station Road
Town / City Athens
Postal code 30605-2700
State Georgia
Country USA"USA" is not in the list (Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, ...) of allowed values for the "Country" property.
Email address test@test.com
Phone 706-355-8403
Fax 706-355-8302




HSPF


Metadata

Summary

Also known as
Model type Modular
Model part of larger framework

Technical specs

Supported platforms Windows
Other platform
Programming language Fortran77
Other program language
Code optimized Single Processor
Multiple processors implemented
Nr of distributed processors
Nr of shared processors
Start year development 1997
Does model development still take place? Yes
If above answer is no, provide end year model development
Code development status
When did you indicate the 'code development status'?
Model availability As code
Source code availability
(Or provide future intension)
Through web repository
Source web address http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/
Source csdms web address
Program license type Other
Program license type other --
Memory requirements This model system is designed for the IBM PC family of microcomputer or compatible systems running under version 3.30 or higher of the Microsoft or PC Disk Operating Systems (PC or MS DOS--refer to DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM section). Properly configured, this model system and its support files and programs can be executed under PC DOS or MS DOS 3.30 and later versions, DOS 4.0x, DOS 5.0x, or DOS 6.x.
Typical run time --


In/Output

Describe input parameters Data needs for HSPF can be extensive. HSPF is a continuous simulation

program and requires continuous data to drive the simulations. At a minimum, continuous rainfall records are required to drive the runoff model and additional records of evapotranspiration, temperature, and solar intensity are desirable. A large number of model parameters can be specified although default values are provided where reasonable values are available. HSPF is a general-purpose program and special attention has been paid to cases where input parameters are omitted. In addition, option flags allow bypassing of whole sections of the program where data are not available.

Input format ASCII
Other input format
Describe output parameters HSPF produces a time history of the runoff flow rate, sediment load, and

nutrient and pesticide concentrations, along with a time history of water quantity and quality at any point in a watershed. Simulation results can be processed through a frequency and duration analysis routine that produces output compatible with conventional toxicological measures (e.g., 96-hour LC50).

Output format ASCII
Other output format
Pre-processing software needed? No
Describe pre-processing software
Post-processing software needed? No
Describe post-processing software
Visualization software needed? No
If above answer is yes
Other visualization software


Process

Describe processes represented by the model HSPF assumes that the "Stanford Watershed Model" hydrologic model is

appropriate for the area being modeled. Further, the instream model assumes the receiving water body is well-mixed with width and depth and is thus limited to well-mixed rivers and reservoirs. Application of this methodology generally requires a team effort because of its comprehensive nature.

Describe key physical parameters and equations
Describe length scale and resolution constraints
Describe time scale and resolution constraints
Describe any numerical limitations and issues


Testing

Describe available calibration data sets SPF and the earlier models from which it was developed have been extensively

applied in a wide variety of hydrologic and water quality studies (3,4), including pesticide runoff model testing (5), aquatic fate and transport model testing (6,7), and analyses of agricultural best management practices (8,9). An application of HSPF in a screening methodology for pesticide review is described by Donigian et al. (10). In addition, HSPF has been validated with both field data and model experiments, and has been reviewed by independent experts (11-20).

The Stream Transport and Agricultural Runoff for Exposure Assessment Methodology (STREAM) applies the HSPF program to various test watersheds for five major crops in four agricultural regions in the United States, defines a "representative" watershed based on regional conditions and an extrapolation of the calibration for the test watershed, and performs a sensitivity analysis on key pesticide parameters to generate cumulative frequency distributions of pesticide loads and concentrations in each regions. The resulting methodology requires the user to evaluate only the crops and regions of interest, the pesticide application rate, and three pesticide parameters -- the partition coefficient, the soil/sediment decay rate, and the solution decay rate.

The EPA Chesapeake Bay Program has been using the HSPF model as the framework for modeling total watershed contributions of flow, sediment, and nutrients (and associated constituents such as water temperature, DO, BOD, etc.) to the tidal region of the Chesapeake Bay (21,22). The watershed modeling represents pollutant contributions from an area of more than 68,000 sq. mi., and provides the input to drive a fully dynamic three-dimensional, hydrodynamic/water quality model of the Bay. The watershed drainage area is divided into land segments and stream channel segments. The land areas modeled include forest, agricultural cropland (conventional and conservation tillage systems), pasture, urban (pervious and impervious areas), and uncontrolled animal waste contributions. The stream channel simulation includes flow routing and oxygen and nutrient biochemical modeling (through phytoplankton) in order to account for instream processes affecting nutrient delivery to the Bay.

Currently, buildup/washoff type algorithms are being used for urban impervious areas, potency factors for all pervious areas, and constant (or seasonally variable) concentrations for all subsurface contributions and animal waste components. Enhancements are underway to utilize the detailed process (i.e. Agrichemical modules) simulation for cropland areas to better represent the impacts of agricultural BMPs and to include nitrogen cycling in forested systems to evaluate the impacts of atmospheric deposition of nitrogen on Chesapeake Bay. The watershed modeling is being used to evaluate nutrient management alternatives for attaining a 40% reduction in nutrient loads delivered to the Bay, as defined in a joint agreement among the governors of the member states.

Upload calibration data sets if available:
Describe available test data sets
Upload test data sets if available:
Describe ideal data for testing


Other

Do you have current or future plans for collaborating with other researchers? http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/
Is there a manual available? Yes
Upload manual if available:
Model website if any http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/swater/hspf/ The HSPF User's Manual is available as a WordPerfect (version 5.1) document in (binary, non-ASCII) files HSPF_V11.001, HSPF_V11.002, HSPF_V11.003,

HSPF_V11.004, HSPF_V11.005, HSPF_V11.006, and HSPF_V11.007 in the DOCUMENT sub-directory. Refer to file READ.ME in the README sub-directory for further information on the storage format and printing requirements of the user's manual files.

Model forum / discussion board
Comments

Introduction

History

Papers

Issues

Help

Input Files

Output Files

Download

Source