Reference:Reference-002671: Difference between revisions

From CSDMS
m (Text replacement - "|MS_PublicationClusterID=2268412354" to "|MS_PublicationClusterID=2268412354 |Semantic_ID=81c023e109718cc1ac31fb371c906238d4797b22 ")
m (Text replacement - " |Semantic_ID" to " |Semantic_ID")
 
Line 15: Line 15:
|FeatureRef=No
|FeatureRef=No
|PublicationClusterID=0
|PublicationClusterID=0
|MS_PublicationClusterID=2268412354 |Semantic_ID=81c023e109718cc1ac31fb371c906238d4797b22
|MS_PublicationClusterID=2268412354
|Semantic_ID=81c023e109718cc1ac31fb371c906238d4797b22
|PublicationWhatKindOf=a module application description
|PublicationWhatKindOf=a module application description
|PublicationNrofModels=a single module
|PublicationNrofModels=a single module

Latest revision as of 14:49, 9 January 2022



Author(s) Camargo, G.G.T.; Kemanian, A.R.;
BibType journalArticle
Title Six crop models differ in their simulation of water uptake
Editors
Year 2016-04-01
Journal Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Booktitle
Volume 220
Pages 116–129
URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168192316300156
DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.01.013
ISBN
Note Auto downloaded ref at: 2020-06-17


 
Feature reference No
PublicationClusterID 0
MS_PublicationClusterID 2268412354
Semantic_ID 81c023e109718cc1ac31fb371c906238d4797b22
Nr of citations 33
Sort of publication a module application description
Sort of model publication a single module
Is the CSDMS HPC used No
If HPC is used, for what project was it?:
Associated simulation movie if any:


Model(s) discussed: ApsimX