Meeting:Abstract 2011 CSDMS meeting-006: Difference between revisions

From CSDMS
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "USA" to "United States")
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<!--{{CSDMS meeting program template
|CSDMS meeting first hydrological choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting first terrestrial choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting first coastal choice=Delft3D
|CSDMS meeting first marine choice=ROMS
|CSDMS meeting first carbonate choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting first tool choice=I am not interested
}}-->
{{CSDMS meeting personal information template
{{CSDMS meeting personal information template
|CSDMS meeting first name=Rudy
|CSDMS meeting first name=Rudy
Line 6: Line 13:
|CSDMS meeting city=University Park
|CSDMS meeting city=University Park
|CSDMS meeting state=Pennsylvania
|CSDMS meeting state=Pennsylvania
|CSDMS meeting country=USA
|CSDMS meeting country=United States
|CSDMS meeting email address=sling@psu.edu
|CSDMS meeting email address=sling@psu.edu
|CSDMS meeting phone=814 865-6892
|CSDMS meeting phone=814 865-6892
Line 14: Line 21:
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title template
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title template
|CSDMS meeting abstract title=TBA
|CSDMS meeting abstract title=Relationships between sediment caliber and delta shoreline geometry and stratigraphy
}}
{{CSDMS meeting authors template
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Alexander
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Burpee
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, State College
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=University Park
|State=Pennsylvania
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=United States
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=apb5160@psu.edu
}}
{{CSDMS meeting authors template
|CSDMS meeting coauthor first name abstract=Doug
|CSDMS meeting coauthor last name abstract=Edmonds
|CSDMS meeting coauthor institute / Organization=Geology & Geophysics, Boston College
|CSDMS meeting coauthor town-city=Chestnut Hill
|State=Minnesota
|CSDMS meeting coauthor country=United States
|CSDMS meeting coauthor email address=dedmonds@umn.edu
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template
|CSDMS meeting abstract=Recent morphodynamic modeling of non-uniform turbulent transport and deposition of sediment in a standing body of water devoid of tides and waves shows that sediment caliber plays a major role in determining the shapes, cumulative number of distributaries, and wetland areas of river-dominated deltas. In this study we introduce metrics for quantifying delta shoreline rugosity and foreset dip (clinoform) variability, and explore their variation with sediment caliber. Delta shoreline rugosity is calculated using the isoperimetric quotient, IP = 4 pi A / P2, where a circle has a value of one. Clinoform complexity is calculated using the uniformity test in circular statistics wherein clinoform dip direction uniformity is the sum of the deviations of dip azimuths from a theoretical uniform distribution. Analysis of fifteen simulated deltas shows that IP increases from 0.1 to 0.5 as the normalized shear stress for re-erosion of cohesive sediment, τn, increases from 0.65 to 1. Clinoform dip azimuth uniformity decreases from 300 to 130 with increasing τn. Preliminary analysis of data from outcrops of the Cretaceous Ferron Delta and ground penetrating radar data of the Pleistocene Weber and Brigham City Deltas are consistent with these trends. These results imply that changes in sediment caliber delivered to a deltaic coastal system will profoundly change its wetland area, bathymetric hypsometry, ecological function, and interior stratigraphy.
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template}}
{{blank line template}}
{{blank line template}}
{{CSDMS meeting program template
{{CSDMS meeting program template1
|CSDMS meeting first hydrological choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting first day choice=I can not attend a clinic
|CSDMS meeting first terrestrial choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting second day choice=Delft3D
|CSDMS meeting first coastal choice=Delft3D
|CSDMS meeting third day choice=HPCC
|CSDMS meeting first marine choice=ROMS
|CSDMS meeting first carbonate choice=I am not interested
|CSDMS meeting first tool choice=I am not interested
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting logistics template
{{CSDMS meeting logistics template
|Attend all days=Yes
|Attend all days=Yes
|CSDMS arrange hotel=Yes
|CSDMS arrange hotel=Yes
|Check in date=2011/10/28
|Check in date=2011/10/27
|Check out date=2011/10/30
|Check out date=2011/10/31
|Share a room=No
|Share a room=No
|CSDMS meeting dinner=No
|CSDMS meeting dinner=No
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 15:10, 10 June 2017


Browse  abstracts

CSDMS all hands meeting 2011

Relationships between sediment caliber and delta shoreline geometry and stratigraphy

Rudy Slingerland, Penn State University University Park Pennsylvania, . sling@psu.edu
Alexander Burpee, Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, State College University Park Pennsylvania, United States. apb5160@psu.edu
Doug Edmonds, Geology & Geophysics, Boston College Chestnut Hill Minnesota, United States. dedmonds@umn.edu


[[Image:|300px|right|link=File:]]Recent morphodynamic modeling of non-uniform turbulent transport and deposition of sediment in a standing body of water devoid of tides and waves shows that sediment caliber plays a major role in determining the shapes, cumulative number of distributaries, and wetland areas of river-dominated deltas. In this study we introduce metrics for quantifying delta shoreline rugosity and foreset dip (clinoform) variability, and explore their variation with sediment caliber. Delta shoreline rugosity is calculated using the isoperimetric quotient, IP = 4 pi A / P2, where a circle has a value of one. Clinoform complexity is calculated using the uniformity test in circular statistics wherein clinoform dip direction uniformity is the sum of the deviations of dip azimuths from a theoretical uniform distribution. Analysis of fifteen simulated deltas shows that IP increases from 0.1 to 0.5 as the normalized shear stress for re-erosion of cohesive sediment, τn, increases from 0.65 to 1. Clinoform dip azimuth uniformity decreases from 300 to 130 with increasing τn. Preliminary analysis of data from outcrops of the Cretaceous Ferron Delta and ground penetrating radar data of the Pleistocene Weber and Brigham City Deltas are consistent with these trends. These results imply that changes in sediment caliber delivered to a deltaic coastal system will profoundly change its wetland area, bathymetric hypsometry, ecological function, and interior stratigraphy.