2023 CSDMS meeting-052: Difference between revisions

From CSDMS
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 22: Line 22:
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract poster Epub 2023
{{CSDMS meeting abstract poster Epub 2023
|CSDMS meeting poster Epub submit 2023=Epub
|CSDMS meeting poster Epub submit 2023=Poster
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title temp2023
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title temp2023

Latest revision as of 15:44, 26 May 2023



(if you haven't already)



"TN" is not in the list (NO STATE, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, D.C., Delaware, ...) of allowed values for the "CSDMS meeting state" property.
Log in (or create account for non-CSDMS members)
Forgot username? Search or email:CSDMSweb@colorado.edu


Browse  abstracts


Equilibrium elevation of the lower Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Delta


Chris Tasich, Vanderbilt University Nashville , United States. chris.tasich@gmail.com



The natural elevation of the vast, flat landscape of the lower Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna (GBM) remains remarkably stable despite persistent relative sea level rise (rSLR). This stability stems from the tight coupling of the land and tides through a robust negative feedback induced by periodic flooding with sediment-rich water. As water levels increase, the inundation depth and duration also increase resulting in more sediment deposition. This has a stabilizing effect and largely negates the initial increase in water level such that the elevation surface appears unchanged. We refer to this stable elevation as the equilibrium elevation.


Here, we investigate the strength of the inundation feedback and the resulting equilibrium elevation. We identify three main controls on this feedback - (1) annual rate of rSLR, (2) mean tidal range (TR), and (3) mean suspended sediment concentration (SSC). We explore the realistic parameter space of each using a simple, zero-dimensional mass balance model. Specifically, we ask (1) what equilibrium elevations are feasible, (2) how these equilibrium elevations compare to tides (e.g., relative to mean sea level (MSL) or mean high water (MHW)), and (3) how equilibrium elevation impacts the duration (hydroperiod) and intensity (depth) of a typical inundation cycle. Results show an incredibly robust feedback for most conditions with the notable exception of low SSCs (< 0.1 g/L). This low, yet realistic value of SSC represents a tipping point at which the equilibrium elevation drops precipitously. At higher rates of rSLR (> 8mm/yr) and lower TR (< 2 m) the equilibrium elevation results in complete drowning of the platform.