2022 CSDMS meeting-094: Difference between revisions
From CSDMS
(Created page with "{{CSDMS meeting personal information template-2022 |CSDMS meeting first name=Jeffrey |CSDMS meeting last name=Keck |CSDMS meeting institute=University of Washington |CSDMS mee...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template 2022 | {{CSDMS meeting abstract template 2022 | ||
|CSDMS meeting abstract=In the same way that watersheds filter precipitation signals into a time series of flow response, watersheds also filter sediment production signals into a time series of bedload transport. Here, we describe the Mass Wasting Router, a new watershed-scale sediment production and transport model written in Landlab that couples an existing shallow landslide hazard model (LandslideProbability) with an existing network-scale bedload transport model (NetworkSedimentTransporter) by (1) delineating hillslope scale landslides from maps of landslide probability, (2) routing the landslides through the watershed using a “precipiton” or “agent” style model and (3) fluvially eroding the mass wasting deposits and creating parcels for the NetworkSedimentTransporter. Preliminary model runs | |CSDMS meeting abstract=In the same way that watersheds filter precipitation signals into a time series of flow response, watersheds also filter sediment production signals into a time series of bedload transport. Here, we describe the Mass Wasting Router, a new watershed-scale sediment production and transport model written in Landlab that couples an existing shallow landslide hazard model (LandslideProbability) with an existing network-scale bedload transport model (NetworkSedimentTransporter) by (1) delineating hillslope scale landslides from maps of landslide probability, (2) routing the landslides through the watershed using a “precipiton” or “agent” style model and (3) fluvially eroding the mass wasting deposits and creating parcels for the NetworkSedimentTransporter. Preliminary model runs indicate that variation in soil cohesion and precipitation intensity drive landslide-derived hillslope sediment production rates but valley storage processes, driven by debris flow deposition patterns, modulate the rate that sediment reaches the basin outlet. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{blank line template}} | {{blank line template}} | ||
Revision as of 09:27, 12 April 2022
(if you haven't already)
Log in (or create account for non-CSDMS members)
Forgot username? Search or email:CSDMSweb@colorado.edu
Browse abstracts
Mass Wasting Router: A watershed-scale sediment production and transport model
Jeffrey Keck,
University of Washington Seattle Washington, United States. keckje@gmail.com
Erkan Istanbulluoglu, University of Washington Seattle Washington, United States. erkani@uw.edu
In the same way that watersheds filter precipitation signals into a time series of flow response, watersheds also filter sediment production signals into a time series of bedload transport. Here, we describe the Mass Wasting Router, a new watershed-scale sediment production and transport model written in Landlab that couples an existing shallow landslide hazard model (LandslideProbability) with an existing network-scale bedload transport model (NetworkSedimentTransporter) by (1) delineating hillslope scale landslides from maps of landslide probability, (2) routing the landslides through the watershed using a “precipiton” or “agent” style model and (3) fluvially eroding the mass wasting deposits and creating parcels for the NetworkSedimentTransporter. Preliminary model runs indicate that variation in soil cohesion and precipitation intensity drive landslide-derived hillslope sediment production rates but valley storage processes, driven by debris flow deposition patterns, modulate the rate that sediment reaches the basin outlet.
