2019 CSDMS meeting-101: Difference between revisions

From CSDMS
(Created page with "{{CSDMS meeting personal information template-2019 |CSDMS meeting first name=Benjamin |CSDMS meeting last name=Meinen |CSDMS meeting institute=University of Waterloo |CSDMS me...")
 
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting select clinics3 2019
{{CSDMS meeting select clinics3 2019
|CSDMS_meeting_select_clinics3_2019=5) Will not attend a clinic
|CSDMS_meeting_select_clinics3_2019=3) SALib - Model Sensitivity Analysis
}}
}}
{{CSDMS scholarships yes no
{{CSDMS scholarships yes no
Line 24: Line 24:
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract yes no 2019
{{CSDMS meeting abstract yes no 2019
|CSDMS meeting abstract submit=No
|CSDMS meeting abstract submit=Yes
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title temp2019
|CSDMS meeting abstract title=Mapping Erosion and Deposition in an Agricultural Landscape: A Spatial Validation of Erosion Models
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template 2019
|CSDMS meeting abstract=Past decades have seen rapid advancements in the field of soil erosion modelling, with a shift away from lumped empirical models and towards fully-distributed physically-based erosion models. The benefits of this shift is that distributed erosion models facilitate the spatial predictions of erosion and deposition across the landscapes by computing runoff and modelling the subsequent detachment, transport, and deposition of sediments. Despite the ability to represent the physical process of erosion spatially, distributed erosion models are validated to discharge and sediment yield at catchment outlets. Spatial information on erosion and deposition rates are seldom used to validate distributed models; this is because both plot and field-scale data on erosion rates are rare. Structure-from-motion (SfM) and multi-view stereo (MVS) algorithms coupled with the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become a popular tool in geomorphology for modelling topographic change-detection on complex landscapes. We demonstrate the viability of using these techniques to generate spatial validation data; repeat UAV surveys of an agricultural field are used to identify dominant sediment flow paths, depositional zones, and rill/gully erosion processes. This unique spatial dataset allows us to tackle issues of spatial equifinality, model parameterization, and the accurate discretization of the landscape.
}}
}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract title temp2019}}
{{CSDMS meeting abstract template 2019}}
{{blank line template}}
{{blank line template}}

Revision as of 12:36, 28 March 2019





Log in (or create account for non-CSDMS members)
Forgot username? Search or email:CSDMSweb@colorado.edu



Browse  abstracts



Mapping Erosion and Deposition in an Agricultural Landscape: A Spatial Validation of Erosion Models

Benjamin Meinen, University of Waterloo Waterloo , Canada. benjmeinen@hotmail.com


Past decades have seen rapid advancements in the field of soil erosion modelling, with a shift away from lumped empirical models and towards fully-distributed physically-based erosion models. The benefits of this shift is that distributed erosion models facilitate the spatial predictions of erosion and deposition across the landscapes by computing runoff and modelling the subsequent detachment, transport, and deposition of sediments. Despite the ability to represent the physical process of erosion spatially, distributed erosion models are validated to discharge and sediment yield at catchment outlets. Spatial information on erosion and deposition rates are seldom used to validate distributed models; this is because both plot and field-scale data on erosion rates are rare. Structure-from-motion (SfM) and multi-view stereo (MVS) algorithms coupled with the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become a popular tool in geomorphology for modelling topographic change-detection on complex landscapes. We demonstrate the viability of using these techniques to generate spatial validation data; repeat UAV surveys of an agricultural field are used to identify dominant sediment flow paths, depositional zones, and rill/gully erosion processes. This unique spatial dataset allows us to tackle issues of spatial equifinality, model parameterization, and the accurate discretization of the landscape.